2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heat flux on the burning behaviour of foam and foam/Nomex III fabric combination in the cone calorimeter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
8
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Table 5, yields of CO 2 and CO measured in this work are in the same order of magnitude as those found by other authors [20][21] [22]. A significant difference is found in the CO 2 yield for an irradiance level of 10 kW•m -2 , as Kotresh et al [21] reported non-ignition of the polyurethane sample. Only one data point was found for NO yield [20], which is 5.5 times larger than the value found in current tests.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As seen in Table 5, yields of CO 2 and CO measured in this work are in the same order of magnitude as those found by other authors [20][21] [22]. A significant difference is found in the CO 2 yield for an irradiance level of 10 kW•m -2 , as Kotresh et al [21] reported non-ignition of the polyurethane sample. Only one data point was found for NO yield [20], which is 5.5 times larger than the value found in current tests.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This soot yield is small compared to CO 2 yield of 2.43 g•g sample -1 measured by the same study [20]. Kotresh et al [21] calculated a ratio between CO and CO 2 mass flows near 2%, while our experiments give a ratio of 1% for all the irradiance levels (see column CO/CO 2 of Table 4).…”
Section: Results and Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Heat rapidly penetrates through such materials, resulting in a negligible temperature gradient within them. However, the use of cone calorimeters to study thermally thin materials such as fabrics has been limited [8][9][10][11]. Cone calorimetry studies of contaminated and decontaminated FR fabrics were not found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, cone calorimetry has been widely used as a small-scale test for characterizing the flammability of FPUF, FPUF composites, and BFs, and attempts (of varying success) have been made to correlate the small-scale results with the burning behavior of real-scale RUF. Several researchers have reported on cone calorimetric testing of flexible polyurethane foam FPUF/fabric composites [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Most studies [9,[12][13][14][15][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] used HRR data for screening upholstery materials, while others [16,17,27] employed the approach to study the effects of flame retardants on the burning behavior of FPUF/fabric composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%