IntroductionThe manufacturing of Portland cement causes CO 2 emission through the calcination of the raw materials during clinker production. One ton of Portland cement production results in the release of approximately one ton of CO 2 emissions into the atmosphere. Global CO 2 emission from cement production is now 5-8% and it is estimated to be about 17% in a few years due to the fast growing industry [1]. The development of new binding materials with low CO 2 impact is essential for future global warming solutions since many scientists predict that level of CO 2 in the atmosphere already go beyond the safe limit [2].Blended cements obtained by mixing Portland cement with mineral admixtures are widely used in building industry in order to reduce the use of Portland cement. The use of such materials may lead not only to a significant reduction in CO 2 emission but also to an improvement in workability and sulphate resistance, low-cost, reduced energy consumption, lower heat of hydration, enhanced long-term mechanical strength and so on [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Nevertheless, there are some disadvantage of using blended cement. The main one in general is that they have an early strength development lower than Portland cement [4,12,13]. Besides, only a portion of the cement in concrete is replaced by supplementary cementing materials.Nowadays, new binding material seen as an alternative to Portland cement is being developed. This new technology could release 80-90% less CO 2 emission related to the manufacturing of cement, while at the same time it provides high early strength, freeze-thaw resistance, corrosion resistance and suphate resistance [14,15] [21], they all designate the same mechanism, which involves an alkali activation of natural or artificial aluminosilicate materials such as fly ash [22,23,24,25], blast furnace slag [26,27], kaoline [28] and natural pozzolans [29,30].