2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heat treatment on transformation-induced plasticity of economical Cr19 duplex stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M d 30 temperature, at which half of austenite can be transformed into martensite under plastic deformation with true strain of 0.3, calculated by Equation , can be a criterion for the austenitic stability, Figure b. The lower M d 30 temperature represented the higher austenitic stability . The M d 30 temperature of DSS‐1 was calculated to be about −28.6 °C, which was lower than that of DSS‐2 (21.3 °C), indicating that the austenitic stability of DSS‐1 was higher than that of DSS‐2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The M d 30 temperature, at which half of austenite can be transformed into martensite under plastic deformation with true strain of 0.3, calculated by Equation , can be a criterion for the austenitic stability, Figure b. The lower M d 30 temperature represented the higher austenitic stability . The M d 30 temperature of DSS‐1 was calculated to be about −28.6 °C, which was lower than that of DSS‐2 (21.3 °C), indicating that the austenitic stability of DSS‐1 was higher than that of DSS‐2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The austenite islands were embedded in the ferrite matrix. Many annealing twins were observed in austenite phase but they have not been observed in ferrite phase due to the lower stacking fault energy (SFE) of austenite . The grain size of DSS‐1 was similar to that of DSS‐2 but the austenite fraction of DSS‐1 was significantly higher than that of DSS‐2, indicating that the addition of Ni had little influence on the grain size of experimental steels but it can effectively promote the formation of austenite phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the true strain above 0.15, the increment slope of the true stress decreased for solution treated specimen compared with as-rolled specimen. Meanwhile, No obvious yield behavior are observed in the shapes of curves with Mn addition higher than 3.6 wt.%, indicating strain hardening occurring with increasing Mn content [26], this is related to dislocation strengthening caused by volume fraction difference of two phases with more Mn addition [27]. The region of uniform elongation for as-rolled and solution treated specimens became much shorter with Mn addition increased to 8.1 wt.%, showing comparatively low plasticity with more austenite formation, which can be attributed to larger deformation strains of austenite than that of ferrite [28].…”
Section: Mechanical Property Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the past, sufficient amounts of alloy elements such as chromium, molybdenum and nickel were added in conventional DSSs to achieve better pitting resistance in order to meet the requirement of aggressive corrosion environment. Meanwhile, mechanical properties were also always achieved by solid solution hardening of the additional substitutional elements [6]. Recently, lean alloying DSSs, which is nearly nickel/molybdenum free and could exhibit better mechanical properties, is becoming an important subject on developing advanced structural materials in order to meet the exhaustion of natural resources without degrading their corrosion properties [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%