2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heating rate on mechanical property, microstructure and texture evolution of Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy during solution treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21,22] AlFeMnSi particles do not dissolve during solution treatment, [21,23] whereas Si, Mg 2 Si, and Al 1.9 Mg 4.1 Si 3.3 Cu precipitates can be dissolved completely. Table I shows the values of C a/b , D 0 , and Q for Mg, Si, and Cu elements.…”
Section: B Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[21,22] AlFeMnSi particles do not dissolve during solution treatment, [21,23] whereas Si, Mg 2 Si, and Al 1.9 Mg 4.1 Si 3.3 Cu precipitates can be dissolved completely. Table I shows the values of C a/b , D 0 , and Q for Mg, Si, and Cu elements.…”
Section: B Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors and their effects can be summarized as follows: (a) time delay: although the heating rate of the sample in salt bath furnace is very high, it still needs a few seconds to reach 828 K (555°C), [21] during which the diffusion coefficient D of each solute element is smaller than that at 828 K (555°C), resulting in the actual dissolution time longer than the theoretic one; (b) diffusion coefficient D: the diffusion coefficients of solute elements are influenced by each other and change with the change of the precipitate shape and size, and thus they change a little bit during solution treatment, which also affects the actual needed dissolution time of precipitates; (c) composition of precipitates: we assume that the composition of precipitates remains the same during solution treatment; however, it cannot kept unchanged during the solution treatment due to the different diffusion rates of Mg, Si, and Cu elements, which can shorten the actual dissolution time of precipitates; (d) shape of precipitates: most of the Mg 2 Si and Al 1.9 Mg 4.1 Si 3.3 Cu particles do not have a spherical shape before solution treatment, and their actual dissolution time should be longer than those of theoretical prediction by assuming a spherical shape [26] ; (e) size and space between two precipitates: we assume that the size and space between two precipitates do not change, but in the experimental alloy both of them change with the increase of dissolution time; (f) dislocation: the existence of dislocation can increase the diffusion rate of solute elements and further reduce the dissolution time of precipitates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 6xxx aluminum alloys (Al-Mg-Si-Cu series) show good bake hardening temper, 6xxx aluminum alloys are well suitable for automotive skin and other structure members in machinery 6 . The fabrication process of a typical 6xxx alloy mainly consists of casting, scalping, homogenization, hot rolling, intermediate annealing, cold rolling, solution treatment, pre-aging, natural aging, forming, painting and paint baking 2,7 . During the rolling process, an ingot sheet will be deformed to the final shape and size, accompanied by the generation of textures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different textures correspond to specific Euler angles (φ 1 , φ, φ 2 ) in ODF. Table 1 shows the main textures and their corresponding Euler angles and Miller indices 7,[12][13][14][15] . Different processing parameters can generate various textures of the alloys, with different mechanical properties and microstructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation