1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00283160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heavy metals on microorganisms in soils near a secondary lead smelter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
16
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study showed that the total number of nematodes did respond to an increase in Cu-CaCl 2 , although earlier reports suggested that the total number of nematodes is not a sensitive indicator of heavy-metal pollution [30,31]. The most likely reason for this discrepancy is the difference in bioavailability, which emphasizes the advantage of the CaCl 2 extraction method.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The present study showed that the total number of nematodes did respond to an increase in Cu-CaCl 2 , although earlier reports suggested that the total number of nematodes is not a sensitive indicator of heavy-metal pollution [30,31]. The most likely reason for this discrepancy is the difference in bioavailability, which emphasizes the advantage of the CaCl 2 extraction method.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Spurgeon & Hopkin (1996a) found a significant reduction in earthworm abundance at sites within 2 km of the Avonmouth smelter, while Bengtsson, Nordstr‘m & Rundgren (1983) found lower total numbers and biomass in soils around a brass mill. Bisessar (1982) and Hunter, Johnson & Thompson (1987) found decreased abundance of worms in soils near a lead smelter and copper refinery, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include studies undertaken to quantify community change in major invertebrate groups along metal contamination gradients [7,56], as well as studies with specific soil taxa like earthworms [57][58][59], springtails [8,60], mites [61], ground beetles [62] and spiders [63]. Changes observed in these studies included reduced overall abundance (including the presence of deserts for some groups), lower diversity as assessed using traditional metrics, altered community composition and changes in species dominance structure [64].…”
Section: Populations and Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%