2016
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2016.1193243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heterosubstituent and ring puckering angle on linear and nonlinear properties of exo-insaturated four-membered heterocycles, Y=CCH2CH2X: a comparative ab initio, DFT and semi-empirical study

Abstract: The influence of heterosubstituent and ring puckering angle (ϕ) on electronic properties (μ, α, β and γ ) of 16 four-membered heterocycles (1-16) were demonstrated theoretically using ab initio (HF and MP2), density functional theory (DFT) (PBE1PBE, SVWN5 and B3LYP) and semi-empirical (PM6 and PM3) treatments. Comparing the DFT and ab initio methods, these showed a similar description of electric dipole moment (μ) and polarisability (α) for each one of the studied heterocycles, with small differences in the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain more information about the carboxamide rotamerism, a conformational analysis was performed on 6-fluoro-3-hydroxy-2-pyrazinecarboxamide 1a as the platform model. The conformational analysis for the enol tautomer was focused on structures having a rotating hydroxyl moiety with a “cisoide” (Figure A) or “transoide” carboxamide, whereas the keto tautomer was focused on structures having only a rotating carboxamide moiety (Figure C). Within the enol tautomer, there are four preferential conformational forms: E_A , E_B , E_C , and E_D (Figure D). Among them, enol tautomer E_A (“cisoide” carboxamide) was identified as the most stable enolic conformer, followed by conformer E_C (“transoide” carboxamide) ( ΔE = 2.0 kcal/mol) and least stable conformers E_B ( ΔE = 5.9 kcal/mol) and E_D ( ΔE = 5.9 kcal/mol).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain more information about the carboxamide rotamerism, a conformational analysis was performed on 6-fluoro-3-hydroxy-2-pyrazinecarboxamide 1a as the platform model. The conformational analysis for the enol tautomer was focused on structures having a rotating hydroxyl moiety with a “cisoide” (Figure A) or “transoide” carboxamide, whereas the keto tautomer was focused on structures having only a rotating carboxamide moiety (Figure C). Within the enol tautomer, there are four preferential conformational forms: E_A , E_B , E_C , and E_D (Figure D). Among them, enol tautomer E_A (“cisoide” carboxamide) was identified as the most stable enolic conformer, followed by conformer E_C (“transoide” carboxamide) ( ΔE = 2.0 kcal/mol) and least stable conformers E_B ( ΔE = 5.9 kcal/mol) and E_D ( ΔE = 5.9 kcal/mol).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%