2015
DOI: 10.14359/51687938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of High Axial Load on Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints with and without Strengthening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loading sequence for BCJs consists of two stages. At the first stage, a medium level [22][23][24] of column axial force of 0.2fc'Ag was loaded, where fc' is the cylinder compressive strength of concrete and Ag is the gross area of the column section. Here fc' is taken as 0.8fcu with fcu being the cubic compressive strength of concrete on the day of testing.…”
Section: Test Setup and Loading Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loading sequence for BCJs consists of two stages. At the first stage, a medium level [22][23][24] of column axial force of 0.2fc'Ag was loaded, where fc' is the cylinder compressive strength of concrete and Ag is the gross area of the column section. Here fc' is taken as 0.8fcu with fcu being the cubic compressive strength of concrete on the day of testing.…”
Section: Test Setup and Loading Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test results showed shear failure at the joints with inadequate ductility. Further, Li et al [20] have also demonstrated the adverse effect to beam-column joints arising from the high axial load acting on the columns.…”
Section: Structural Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fujii and Morita [8] showed, the increase of column axial load level from fc'*Ag/12 to fc'*Ag /4 improved the shear strength of the exterior joints nearly 10 %. Li et al [9] studied the effect of high axial load on the non-seismically designed BCJ with or without strengthening by ferrocement jackets with embedded diagonal reinforcements. The ratios of axial load considered were 0.2 and 0.6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%