2020
DOI: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000000829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of High Homocysteine Level on the Severity of Coronary Heart Disease and Prognosis After Stent Implantation

Abstract: Objectives: To determine the effect of high homocysteine (HCY) levels on the severity of coronary artery disease and prognosis after stent implantation. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 667 patients with coronary heart disease who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation for the first time at the Department of Cardiology, Huludao Central Hospital, from January 2015 to December 2017. The patients were divided into the control and hyperhomoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
2
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study, Shenoy et al [23] suggested that serum HCY level was signi cantly correlated with the Gensini Score of CAD patients (r = 0.443), which was consistent with our data. However, the sample size in a study conducted by Shenoy et al [23] was smaller, and the participants of Li et al [22] and Shenoy et al [23] study were much older compared with ours. In addition, Li and colleagues [22] also showed that the number of coronary artery target vessels in the HHCY group was obviously higher, and patients with high HCY levels had a higher proportion of coronary lesions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In their study, Shenoy et al [23] suggested that serum HCY level was signi cantly correlated with the Gensini Score of CAD patients (r = 0.443), which was consistent with our data. However, the sample size in a study conducted by Shenoy et al [23] was smaller, and the participants of Li et al [22] and Shenoy et al [23] study were much older compared with ours. In addition, Li and colleagues [22] also showed that the number of coronary artery target vessels in the HHCY group was obviously higher, and patients with high HCY levels had a higher proportion of coronary lesions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…However, the sample size in a study conducted by Shenoy et al [23] was smaller, and the participants of Li et al [22] and Shenoy et al [23] study were much older compared with ours. In addition, Li and colleagues [22] also showed that the number of coronary artery target vessels in the HHCY group was obviously higher, and patients with high HCY levels had a higher proportion of coronary lesions. Another study involving HCY levels and premature CAD (56.1 ± 6.2 years of age) in 2019 [24] showed that the HCY levels were signi cantly higher in patients with multi-vessel disease.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their study, Shenoy et al [29] suggested that serum HCY level was significantly correlated with the Gensini Score of CAD patients (r = 0.443), which was consistent with this study. However, the sample size in the study conducted by Shenoy et al [29] was smaller, and the participants of Li et al [28] and Shenoy et al [29] study were much older. In addition, Li et al [28] also showed that the number of coronary artery target vessels in the HHCY group was obviously higher, and patients with high HCY levels had a higher proportion of coronary lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The results of this study showed a positive correlation between HHCY and angiographic severity expressed by Gensini Score. Li et al [28] studied 667 middle-aged and elderly CAD patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation and reported that patients with HHCY had a higher stenosis degree, as indicated by elevated SYNTAX scores. In their study, Shenoy et al [29] suggested that serum HCY level was significantly correlated with the Gensini Score of CAD patients (r = 0.443), which was consistent with this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%