2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of high hyperbaric pressure on rock cutting process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To predict and understand the underwater excavation mechanism of a tool-rock system, Miedema performed a series of studies, including the development of a mathematical model to estimate the cutting forces for underwater hyperbaric conditions and comparison with atmospheric rock cutting [6][7][8], and performed a cutting experiment in a pressure tank [9]. Chen et al established a numerical model of the dredging excavation by using both the discrete element method (DEM) to model the solid particles and the finite volume method to compute the fluid pressure [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To predict and understand the underwater excavation mechanism of a tool-rock system, Miedema performed a series of studies, including the development of a mathematical model to estimate the cutting forces for underwater hyperbaric conditions and comparison with atmospheric rock cutting [6][7][8], and performed a cutting experiment in a pressure tank [9]. Chen et al established a numerical model of the dredging excavation by using both the discrete element method (DEM) to model the solid particles and the finite volume method to compute the fluid pressure [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other discrete element-based methods have been considered too time consuming and resource demanding, as each block would require a separate study for itself (examples of such studies in [28][29][30]). In addition, Miedema's model gives results similar to hyperbaric rock cutting experiments [24] and has been used for the preliminary design of trenching equipment [31]. Using Miedema's convention, the E sp can be expressed as a function of the horizontal cutting forces, F h , the depth of cut trench, h i , and the width of the blade, w:…”
Section: Specific Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excavation of rock in the hyperbaric environment is different from surface mechanical excavation because additional forces can appear during the cutting process as a result of cavitation in the failure area; the rock will tend to change its behavior from brittle to ductile [24]. Hyperbaric forces appear as well during the dredging process of sand and by extension should be taken into consideration for the excavation of sediments [25].…”
Section: Specific Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the major difference between them is of course related to their environments, particularly the pressure and the temperature of the mining location. According to [7], the cutting forces needed to crack the rocks are 4 to 6 times higher in 180 bar (equivalent to 1800 m water depth) than in the atmospheric conditions. Therefore, seafloor mining vehicles require significantly more energy than their corresponding onshore ones to do their missions in high hydrostatic pressure.…”
Section: Terrestrial Vs Seafloor Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%