Effect of high-pressure homogenization on the structure and thermal properties of maize starch

Native rice starch and linseed gum blends: Effect on the pasting, thermal and rheological properties

“…Higher coefficient of determination (R 2 = 0.99) confirms the best fitting of the power law model to correlate the flow properties of linseed-rice starch blends within the studied viscosity range. The increase in pseudoplasticity with the increasing gum concentration was also reported by many researchers (Wang et al 2008a;Alamri et al 2012bAlamri et al , 2013a. As observed in our studies, linseed Food Sci., 33, 2015 (6): 556-563 doi: 10.17221/243/2015-CJFS gum did not affect the overall flow behaviour but only changed the pseudoplasticity of the system.…”

Effect of dynamic high‐pressure microfluidization on the morphology characteristics and physicochemical properties of maize amylose

“…For most starch particles, their granular shape was lost under high pressure. Similar results were reported by the previous studies on high pressure-treated starches [1,6,9,11,13].…”

“…Starch is one of the most abundant reproducible biological resources and has been widely used as thickener, colloidal stabilizer, gelling agent, bulking agent, water retention agent, and adhesive in paper, textile, adhesive, sweetener, and food industries [1,2]. Many researches have been paying attention to structural and physicochemical properties of starches from various plant sources, such as wheat, maize, rice, cassava, and potato [3].…”

Effect of high-pressure treatment on the structural and rheological properties of resistant corn starch/locust bean gum mixtures

“…Therefore, it could be speculated that treatment at a higher pressure is needed (>600 MPa) to bring out further molecular changes in the morphological characteristics of RS/LBG mixtures though the micrographs of pressure-induced gelatinization could be different from the head-induced one. Many small starch particles still retained their granular structure (see the arrow pointed, B -400 A, C -400 A and B -600 A), suggesting that small particles were more resistant to high pressure (Wang et al, 2008). Invariably, these morphological illustrations provide merely complementary evidence and complete structural interpretation cannot be ruled out unless it is complemented with other structural and physical techniques (e.g.…”