2016
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2015.1077457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of high-pressure processing on moisture sorption properties of brown rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were in agreement with a study done by Yu et al (2016) who reported that soaking brown rice at higher pressures and temperatures yield higher values of final moisture content values which seem independent of time. Yu et al (2016) has referred to this value as equilibrium moisture content (EMC) for brown rice, while in case of foxtail millet it is unclear whether water absorption is thermodynamically an equilibrium process.…”
Section: Water Uptakesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were in agreement with a study done by Yu et al (2016) who reported that soaking brown rice at higher pressures and temperatures yield higher values of final moisture content values which seem independent of time. Yu et al (2016) has referred to this value as equilibrium moisture content (EMC) for brown rice, while in case of foxtail millet it is unclear whether water absorption is thermodynamically an equilibrium process.…”
Section: Water Uptakesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Apart from this, presence of protein has also been found to decrease the percentage of starch gelatinization even at high pressures (Ahmed et al, 2007). Similarly, the effect of high pressure treatment on the starch gelatinization properties has been studied for basmati rice flour slurry (Ahmed et al, 2007); Thai glutinous rice (Ahromrit et al, 2007); japonica rice starch (Tan et al, 2009); rice starch (Li et al, 2012); rice (Boluda-Aguilar et al, 2013); wheat starch (Qiu et al, 2014) and brown rice (Zhu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Gelatinisation Of Starchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MC of the nongerminated grains also boosted significantly, but it was higher for the germinated grains when observed under different pressures and temperatures (Sharma et al, 2018a(Sharma et al, , 2018b. Same observations were obtained by Yu et al, 2016 for brown rice, for Thai glutinous rice by Ahromrit et al, 2006 and by Boluda-Aguilar et al, 2013 for jasmine rice, that MC is influenced by the high pressure soaking of the cereal grains (Sharma et al, 2018a(Sharma et al, , 2018bAhromrit et al, 2006;Boluda-Aguilar et al, 2013;Yu et al, 2016). With increasing soaking pressure and temperature, a boosted degree of starch gelatinization was observed.…”
Section: High Hydrostatic Pressure Processingmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…These phenomena increased the hydration percentage up to 93% in less than an hour, where similar results could be reached with overnight soaking without HPP (Alsalman & Ramaswamy, 2020). The formation of hydrogen bonds between water molecules and starch granules may also aid in the process of hydration (Xue et al, 2017; Yu et al, 2016). The high moisture content (93%) therefore activated the endogenous phytase enzyme, which hydrolyzed the phytic acid (Alsalman & Ramaswamy, 2020; In, Swanson, & Baik, 2007).…”
Section: Degradation Of Phytic Acid In Pulses Through Different Posth...mentioning
confidence: 99%