2013
DOI: 10.15376/biores.8.3.4429-4439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of High Solids Loading on Bacterial Contamination in Lignocellulosic Ethanol Production

Abstract: aContamination by lactic acid-producing bacteria is frequently a major challenge in ethanol processes. In this work, high solids loading was used both to keep bacterial infection under control in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of lignocellulosic biomass and to increase the ethanol productivity of the process. With no sterilization of the substrates, lactic acid bacteria contaminated the fermentation process with 8 and 10% suspended solids (SS) substrates, consumed both pentoses and hexose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several attempts have been made to study and control bacterial contamination in lignocellulosic ethanol production including: (1) adding NaCl and ethanol to wood hydrolysate (Albers et al 2011 ), (2) high solid loading in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) (Ishola et al 2013 ), (3) usage of an antibiotic like gentamicin and biomass autoclaving (Serate et al 2015 ), and (4) usage of bacteriophages (Worley-Morse et al 2015 ). These strategies encounter challenges including: (1) additional cost and need for extensive fine tuning and testing of concentrations of NaCl and ethanol (Albers et al 2011 ), (2) loss of cell viability due to mechanical stress caused by solid particles in high cell loading (Ishola et al 2013 ), (3) cost and environmental challenges posed by gentamicin, energy expenditure and formation of inhibitors due to autoclaving (Serate et al 2015 ), and (4) rise of bacteriophage-insensitive mutants and possibilities of gene transfer from bacteriophages to yeast (Worley-Morse et al 2015 ). One of the potentially scalable and economically feasible solutions to control bacterial contamination is to run the lignocellulosic fermentation at low pH, around pH 4 where the growth and viability of bacteria are drastically reduced (Kádár et al 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts have been made to study and control bacterial contamination in lignocellulosic ethanol production including: (1) adding NaCl and ethanol to wood hydrolysate (Albers et al 2011 ), (2) high solid loading in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) (Ishola et al 2013 ), (3) usage of an antibiotic like gentamicin and biomass autoclaving (Serate et al 2015 ), and (4) usage of bacteriophages (Worley-Morse et al 2015 ). These strategies encounter challenges including: (1) additional cost and need for extensive fine tuning and testing of concentrations of NaCl and ethanol (Albers et al 2011 ), (2) loss of cell viability due to mechanical stress caused by solid particles in high cell loading (Ishola et al 2013 ), (3) cost and environmental challenges posed by gentamicin, energy expenditure and formation of inhibitors due to autoclaving (Serate et al 2015 ), and (4) rise of bacteriophage-insensitive mutants and possibilities of gene transfer from bacteriophages to yeast (Worley-Morse et al 2015 ). One of the potentially scalable and economically feasible solutions to control bacterial contamination is to run the lignocellulosic fermentation at low pH, around pH 4 where the growth and viability of bacteria are drastically reduced (Kádár et al 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethanol production from lignocellulosic materials, such as woody biomass, forest, and agricultural residues, has the potential of reducing society’s dependence on fossil fuels [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Lignocellulosic materials consist of three main structural components: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [ 4 , 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSF of the substrate obtained by integrating the ensiled corncob and diluted molasses without the addition of enzymes, supplements, or yeast strains was referred to as simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with native microorganisms (SSFNM). A conventional SSF is operated at 30 -40 °C with an initial pH of 4.8 -5.5 [4,24], whereas the growth of beneficial microorganisms, such as yeast, is optimal at 24 -34 °C with a pH of 3.5 -4.8 [25]. Therefore, the SSFNM was then studied at low temperatures of 25 -35 °C to retain nutrients for supporting microbial growth and at acidic pH levels of 4.5 -5.5 to activate the functions of beneficial microorganisms for saccharification and ethanol fermentation for 84 h. SSFNM variables were investigated in the desire to produce satisfactory ethanol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%