Effect of High-Speed Resistance Training on Muscle Cross-Sectional Area and Speed of Movement

Hisaeda, H.; Nakamura, Yoshio; Kuno, Shinya; Fukunaga, Tetsuo; Muraoka, Isao

doi:10.7600/jspfsm1949.45.345

Cited by 2 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A random-effects subgroup analysis with a pooled estimate of tau squared was performed to determine if training status (trained or untrained) influenced whether strength was affected by exercise velocity. Four studies were in the trained group (7,22,31,49), and 20 studies (with 21 effect sizes) were in the untrained group (6,9,17,27,32,34,36,39,40,(44)(45)(46)48,51,53,66,67,71,75,80). Test of moderators indicated no significant subgroup effect between training statuses (QM 5 0.01, p 5 0.93) (where QM is the weighted sum of squared deviations of the subgroup means about the grand mean).…”

Section: Meta-analysis Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A second subgroup analysis was conducted to determine whether age influenced strength adaptations due to resistance training velocity. The number of effect sizes included in the young group was 20 from 19 studies (7,9,22,27,31,32,34,36,40,45,46,48,49,51,53,66,67,71,80), whereas 5 studies were included in the older group (6,17,39,44,75). Test of moderators found no significant subgroup effect between age groups, indicating no significant difference between subgroups (QM 5 0.09, p 5 0.77).…”

Section: Meta-analysis Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The modification altered item 27 from a 5-point scale to a yes or no answer. Quality scores of included studies were as follows: excellent (26)(27), good (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), fair (15)(16)(17)(18)(19), and poor (#14) (28).…”

Section: Coding Procedures and Methodological Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All studies scored 0 (criteria not met) for blinding subjects and testers. Thirteen studies were scored as good (7,9,17,31,34,36,39,40,44,46,49,51,75), with 11 studies scored as fair (6,22,27,32,45,48,53,66,67,71,80) (Tables 3).…”

Section: Study Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Intentionally Slow Concentric Velocity Resistance Exercise and Strength Adaptations: A Meta-Analysis

Hermes

Fry

2023

Journal of Strength &Amp; Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hermes, MJ and Fry, AC. Intentionally slow concentric velocity resistance exercise and strength adaptations: a meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 37(8): e470–e484, 2023—Intentionally slow-velocity resistance exercise (ISVRE) is suggested by some to be equally or more effective than fast or traditional velocities for increasing muscular strength. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the effect ISVRE has on strength adaptations compared with faster or traditional velocities, with subgroup analyses exploring age, sex, and training status as confounding factors on the influence of velocity on strength adaptation. Eligible studies (n = 24) were required to be chronic (multiple weeks) randomized or nonrandomized comparative studies using dynamic constant external resistance for training and testing, and pre-post strength assessments. All studies examined healthy individuals (n = 625; fast or traditional n = 306, intentionally slow n = 319). A random-effects meta-analysis indicated a significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect in favor of fast training (effect size [ES] = 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02–0.41, p = 0.03). Publication bias was noted through trim and fill analysis, with an adjusted effect size estimate of 0.32 (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated no difference between trained and untrained subjects (QM = 0.01, p = 0.93), and no difference between older and younger subgroups (QM = 0.09, p = 0.77), despite younger favoring faster (ES = 0.23, p = 0.049) and older not favoring either velocity (ES = 0.16, p = 0.46). Subgroup analysis also indicated women favored faster training (ES = 0.95, p < 0.001) in comparison to men (ES = 0.08, p = 0.58). Contrary to some previous reviews, these results indicate that chronic fast or traditional velocity resistance exercise increases muscular strength to a greater degree than ISVRE training. Resistance training velocity must be considered if strength is a desired outcome.

show abstract

Section: Meta-analysis Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Meta-analysis Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Coding Procedures and Methodological Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Intentionally Slow Concentric Velocity Resistance Exercise and Strength Adaptations: A Meta-Analysis

Hermes

Fry

2023

Journal of Strength &Amp; Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Velocity of repetitions was prescribed by tempo of concentric and eccentric phases in all six studies. Participants in the fast condition performed the concentric phase of repetitions explosively in two studies (Hisaeda, Nakamura, Kuno, Fukunaga, & Muraoka, 1996; Nogueira et al., 2009), while the remaining four studies provided a 1 second tempo (Tanimoto & Ishii, 2006; Usui et al., 2016; Watanabe et al., 2013; Watanabe et al., 2014). The eccentric phase in the fast condition was performed with a 1–3 second tempo (Hisaeda et al., 1996; Nogueira et al., 2009; Tanimoto & Ishii, 2006; Usui et al., 2016; Watanabe et al., 2013; Watanabe et al., 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of movement velocity during resistance training on muscle‐specific hypertrophy: A systematic review

Hackett

Davies

Orr

et al. 2018

European Journal of Sport Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently, it is unclear whether manipulation of movement velocity during resistance exercise has an effect on hypertrophy of specific muscles. The purpose of this systematic review of literature was to investigate the effect of movement velocity during resistance training on muscle hypertrophy. Five electronic databases were searched using terms related to movement velocity and resistance training. Inclusion criteria were randomised and non-randomised comparative studies; published in English; included healthy adults; used dynamic resistance exercise interventions directly comparing fast training to slower movement velocity training; matched in prescribed intensity and volume; duration ≥4 weeks; and measured muscle hypertrophy. A total of six studies were included involving 119 untrained participants. Hypertrophy of the quadriceps was examined in five studies and of the biceps brachii in two studies. Three studies found significantly greater increases in hypertrophy of the quadriceps for moderate-slow compared to fast training. For the remaining studies examining the quadriceps, significant within-group increase in hypertrophy was found for only moderate-slow training in one study and for only fast training in the other study. The two studies that examined hypertrophy of the biceps brachii found greater increases for fast compared to moderate-slow training. Caution is required when interpreting the findings from this review due to the low number of studies, hence insufficient data. Future longitudinal randomised controlled studies in cohorts of healthy adults are required to confirm and extend our findings.

show abstract

Effect of High-Speed Resistance Training on Muscle Cross-Sectional Area and Speed of Movement

Cited by 2 publications

References 19 publications

Intentionally Slow Concentric Velocity Resistance Exercise and Strength Adaptations: A Meta-Analysis

Intentionally Slow Concentric Velocity Resistance Exercise and Strength Adaptations: A Meta-Analysis

Effect of movement velocity during resistance training on muscle‐specific hypertrophy: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About