1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00270-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of higher radiation dose on biochemical control after radical prostatectomy for pT3N0 prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experience, the 5-year biochemical FFF rate was 56% with doses of Ն 64 Gy as compared with 36% with lesser doses (P ‫)81.0ס‬ [21]. Similar results were published by Valicenti et al, who achieved a 3-year biochemical FFF rate of 79% with Ն 64.8 Gy as compared with 33% with lesser doses (P ‫ס‬ 0.02) [16].…”
Section: Salvage Rt Following a Rise In Serum Psa Levelssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experience, the 5-year biochemical FFF rate was 56% with doses of Ն 64 Gy as compared with 36% with lesser doses (P ‫)81.0ס‬ [21]. Similar results were published by Valicenti et al, who achieved a 3-year biochemical FFF rate of 79% with Ն 64.8 Gy as compared with 33% with lesser doses (P ‫ס‬ 0.02) [16].…”
Section: Salvage Rt Following a Rise In Serum Psa Levelssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although we were unable to define a relationship between the RT dose and outcome, Valicente et al reported a dose-response for patients treated with immediate adjuvant RT. Patients who received Ն 61.5 Gy had a 3-year biochemical FFF rate of 91% as compared with 57% with lesser doses (P ‫ס‬ 0.01) [16].…”
Section: Adjuvant Rt In the Psa Eramentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In most of these series with adjuvant RT, 5-year local control rates were 95-100%, compared to 79-83% without adjuvant treatment [9,[17][18][19][20][21][22]. Additionally, significantly improved biochemical control rates (with undetectable PSA following RT -i.e., below values of 0.2 or 0.3 ng/ml) were shown in about 5-6 major retrospective series (table 2) [18,[20][21][22][23][24]. In a recently published series, Valicenti et al [25] demonstrated data of a matched-pair analysis of 72 patients with or without adjuvant RT after RP.…”
Section: Adjuvant Rt For Pt3 Tumors With or Without Positive Marginsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…infiltration of seminal vesicles, have a high rate of distant micrometastases and possibly do not benefit from local RT [17,26]. Valicenti et al [24] have shown that in case of RT for increasing PSA after RP, higher doses are necessary to achieve an undetectable PSA value, most probably because of a larger tumor burden. For 52 patients with undetectable pre-RT PSA levels the 3-year NED (no evidence of disease) rate was 91% for patients irradiated to 61.5 Gy or more and 57% for those irradiated to lower doses (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Adjuvant Rt For Pt3 Tumors With or Without Positive Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With treatment fields limited to prostatic bed and doses of 60-62 Gy, rates of serious side effects are lower than 5%, 2,12 and seems to remain within this range also with the dose escalation to 70 Gy. 13,14 However, low grade toxicity seems to be quite common. In the survey of 75 patients, Pearce reported the incidence of any toxicity registered at any point during the median follow up of 45 months, after the irradiation of 60-66 Gy to prostatic bed, to be 51% for intestinal and 78% for urinary tract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%