2017
DOI: 10.1111/een.12479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of host instar on host discrimination of heterospecific‐parasitised hosts by sympatric parasitoids

Abstract: Effect of host instar on host discrimination of heterospecific parasitized hosts by sympatric parasitoids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In California, a preference for smaller hosts allows A. melinus to displace A. lingnanensis by reducing the number of hosts that grow large enough for A. lingnanensis to produce female progeny (109). Similarly, displacement of A. chrysomphali by A. melinus has been observed in many parts of the Mediterranean basin, with A. melinus tending to lay more eggs and accepting more heterospecifically parasitized hosts than does A. chrysomphali (26,27). In Spain, A. chrysomphali avoids displacement by shifting its host-size preferences depending on activity of the dominant A. melinus (129,130).…”
Section: Exploitative Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In California, a preference for smaller hosts allows A. melinus to displace A. lingnanensis by reducing the number of hosts that grow large enough for A. lingnanensis to produce female progeny (109). Similarly, displacement of A. chrysomphali by A. melinus has been observed in many parts of the Mediterranean basin, with A. melinus tending to lay more eggs and accepting more heterospecifically parasitized hosts than does A. chrysomphali (26,27). In Spain, A. chrysomphali avoids displacement by shifting its host-size preferences depending on activity of the dominant A. melinus (129,130).…”
Section: Exploitative Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%