1985
DOI: 10.1016/0146-6380(85)90055-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of humic acids on numbers and activities of micro-organisms within physiological groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in quality between these two fractions was not as great as one might assume, however, considering that humic substances have been suggested to be highly refractory to bacterial utilization (Alexander 1965;Visser 1985) and to be used by bacteria only as cometabolites with nonhumic labile substrates (De Haan 1974) that were not present in H fractions in our study. In more recent work, humic substances have indeed been recognized as potentially important sources of bacterial production (Hessen 1985;Meyer et al 1987;Tranvik and Hijfle 1987;Tranvik and Sieburth 1989), although these studies did not directly measure the percent contribution of humic substances to total bacterial growth on DOC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference in quality between these two fractions was not as great as one might assume, however, considering that humic substances have been suggested to be highly refractory to bacterial utilization (Alexander 1965;Visser 1985) and to be used by bacteria only as cometabolites with nonhumic labile substrates (De Haan 1974) that were not present in H fractions in our study. In more recent work, humic substances have indeed been recognized as potentially important sources of bacterial production (Hessen 1985;Meyer et al 1987;Tranvik and Hijfle 1987;Tranvik and Sieburth 1989), although these studies did not directly measure the percent contribution of humic substances to total bacterial growth on DOC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Humic substances have been shown to moderate bacterial activity, however (e.g. through trace-element chelation, effects on P cycling, and effects on enzyme activity: Stewart and Wetzel 1982;Visser 1985;Jones et al 1988) and to be cometabolized during bacterial utilization of more labile substrates (De Haan 1974, 1977. It is possible also that some fraction of aquatic humic substances is available as a primary bacterial substrate, and if so, humic substances could play an important role in supporting bacterial secondary production in aquatic ecosystems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Sparling, 1992); hence, the lack of an effect of the LDPs on 467 MBC in the high-organic matter SC soil is not unexpected in a soil which already has 468 high levels of HS. There have been limited studies that investigate the effect of HA 469 on the soil microbial community although it has been found in a nutrient culture 470 medium that the structure of the humic product plays a role in promotion or 471 suppression of populations within the soil microbial community (Visser, 1985). with others,it is possible that application rates were too low to elicit a significant 479 agronomic response (Feibert et al, 2003, Hartz, 2010, Duval et al, 1998 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With aerobes, exposure to humic materials has been shown to have various effects on metabolic activity in general and on the biodegradation of organic pollutant compounds in particular. For example, the growth of heterotrophic and nitrifying bacteria was reported to be stimulated by the addition of humic acids to culture media, and in both cases, the effect was attributed to the alteration of membrane characteristics such that nutrient uptake was enhanced (49,52). Exposure to humic acids improved the survival of Arthrobacter crystallopoietes by unknown mechanisms (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%