2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2361-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on quantitative and qualitative image analysis at 256-slice prospective gating cardiac CT

Abstract: • Cardiac CT helps clinicians to assess patients with coronary artery disease • Hybrid iterative reconstruction provides improved cardiac CT image quality • Hybrid iterative reconstruction improves the number of assessable coronary segments • Hybrid iterative reconstruction improves interobserver agreement on cardiac CT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has to be emphasized that the image quality scores reported here represent the highly subjective image impression of the three readers in this study and may be different when other radiologists score the images. When using advanced hybrid IR, noise texture and spatial resolution were reported as constant by Utsunomiya et al, although slight differences between image texture between FBP and IR were described [28]. In our study, differences in the subjective image quality between the medium and high level of IR were found to be significant in favor of a medium level of IR leading to an improvement of almost 25 %.…”
supporting
confidence: 39%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it has to be emphasized that the image quality scores reported here represent the highly subjective image impression of the three readers in this study and may be different when other radiologists score the images. When using advanced hybrid IR, noise texture and spatial resolution were reported as constant by Utsunomiya et al, although slight differences between image texture between FBP and IR were described [28]. In our study, differences in the subjective image quality between the medium and high level of IR were found to be significant in favor of a medium level of IR leading to an improvement of almost 25 %.…”
supporting
confidence: 39%
“…Many studies have been published within the last years reporting on noise reduction and improvement of low-contrast image quality due to IR in CT examinations of the abdomen [13], the thorax [14,15] and the heart [25 -27]. In recent studies by Utsunomiya et al and Laqmani et al, a progressive improvement of the CNR and subjective image quality in cardiac CT and lowdose chest CT was reported when using different levels of IR compared to FBP [28,29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, reduced image noise was observed with increasing iteration. Utsunomiya et al demonstrated the same results in a different, albeit smaller, patient study using the same iteration algorithm [14,24].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Real plaque can be differentiated from artefacts partly with the aid of HIR. There are currently no published patient studies on the influence of iDose on calcium score in non-contrast cardiac CT. A phantom study conducted by Murazaki et al [15] as well as CTangiography studies performed on phantoms [14] and phantom studies on plaque volume [24,25] can be used for comparison. In their CTA study, Takx et al demonstrated for one that the HIR algorithm improves objective image quality, while having no influence on the quantitative analysis of coronary plaque volume, the analysis of calcium plaque composition or statements on vascular lumen [25].…”
Section: Radiation Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daisuke Utsunomiya et al suggest that using iDose yields higher CNR and better image quality than FBP. He also stated that there is not so significant change in image quality using level 3 iDose compare with iDose 7 [17] (Figure 1). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%