2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of hydraulic retention time on the electro-bioremediation of nitrate in saline groundwater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is in line with previous studies where a positive correlation was observed between low HRTs and high nitrate removal performances (Ceballos‐Escalera et al, 2021; Pous et al, 2017, Puggioni et al, 2022). The present study also demonstrates that this operational mode is improving the ecotoxicological water quality and can provide additional knowledge about the positive effect of high HRTs on denitrifying electro‐bioremediation reactors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This observation is in line with previous studies where a positive correlation was observed between low HRTs and high nitrate removal performances (Ceballos‐Escalera et al, 2021; Pous et al, 2017, Puggioni et al, 2022). The present study also demonstrates that this operational mode is improving the ecotoxicological water quality and can provide additional knowledge about the positive effect of high HRTs on denitrifying electro‐bioremediation reactors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This study indicated that with increasing HRT in the range of 1-4 days, the conductivity of the salt solution and artificial seawater, after passing through the desalination chamber, decreased and a rise in TDS reduction was found since the higher HRT provided enough opportunity for ions to cross the membranes. A similar trend was found for desalination efficiency in a three-chamber MDC in galvanostatic conditions [47] with a power source connected to the MDC making the cathode a negative pole and the anode a positive one. Here, with a decrease in HRT from 30.1 to 2.4, the desalination efficiency decreased from 77% to 12% while the nitrate removal rate increased from 17 up to 131 mg (NO 3 -N) L −1 d −1 .…”
Section: Setting Hydraulic Retention Timesupporting
confidence: 76%