2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42235-020-0028-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Hydroxyapatite Coating Surface Morphology on Adsorption Behavior of Differently Charged Proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to date, the effect of functional surfaces on enzyme immobilization has rarely been reported because of the lack of microscopic research from experiments. Recently, some experimental methods have been employed to study the protein–surface interaction, i.e., circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), atomic force microscopy (AFM), , Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), , and sum frequency generation (SFG) vibrational spectroscopy . However, the adsorption behavior (i.e., orientation and conformation) of proteins on surfaces at the atomistic level is very hard to obtain from experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date, the effect of functional surfaces on enzyme immobilization has rarely been reported because of the lack of microscopic research from experiments. Recently, some experimental methods have been employed to study the protein–surface interaction, i.e., circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), atomic force microscopy (AFM), , Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), , and sum frequency generation (SFG) vibrational spectroscopy . However, the adsorption behavior (i.e., orientation and conformation) of proteins on surfaces at the atomistic level is very hard to obtain from experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could also be influenced by electrostatic interactions between the positively charging QAS and the negatively charging hydroxyapatite. 70…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be contributed by the electrostatic interaction between positively charged quaternary ammonium salts and negatively charged hydroxyapatite. 63 At the same time, a rough surface is more conducive to mineral deposition. It should be noted that the PU-BE sample was not analyzed because it became sticky and could not maintain the membrane structure after 7 days of immersion in simulated body fluids (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%