Effect ofLactobacillus plantarumand Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) on growth performance, immunity and disease resistance of Pangasius catfish (Pangasius bocourti,Sauvage 1880)

Doolgindachbaporn, Sompong; Suksri, Amnuaysilpa

doi:10.1111/anu.12263

Cited by 34 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 103 publications

(127 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…plantarum . Similar results were observed when Jerusalem artichoke (Van Doan et al, 2016b ) or Eryngii mushroom ( Pleurotus eryngii ) (Van Doan et al, 2016c ) were used in combination with Lb. plantarum in a diet fed to Pangasius catfish ( Pangasius bocourti ).…”

Section: Lab As Probioticsupporting

confidence: 76%

“…rhamnosus (Pirarat et al, 2015 ), essential oils (Brum et al, 2017 ), buta–buta ( Excoecaria agallocha ) leaf extracts (Laith et al, 2017 ), β-glucan (Pilarski et al, 2017 ), kefir, low molecular weight sodium alginate, and Lb. plantarum Van Doan et al, 2016a , b , 2017b , and scarlet caterpillar ( Cordyceps militaris ) spent mushroom substrate and Lb. plantarum (Doan et al, 2017 ; Van Doan et al, 2017a ).…”

Section: Pathogenic Labmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various strains of LAB have been studied in their immune modulatory effects on many different finfish species; summarized in Tables 7 , 8 . Genus Lactobacillus is most studied (Salinas et al, 2006 ; Balcázar et al, 2007b ; Picchietti et al, 2009 ; Harikrishnan et al, 2011 ; Biswas et al, 2013 ; Giri et al, 2013 ; Liu et al, 2013 ; Gioacchini et al, 2014 ; Van Doan et al, 2014 , 2016a , b ; Beck et al, 2015 , 2016 ; Mohammadian et al, 2016 ; Lee et al, 2017 ; Zhang Z. et al, 2017 ). The second most investigated genus is Lactococcus (Balcázar et al, 2007b ; Kim et al, 2013 ; Beck et al, 2015 , 2016 ; Nguyen et al, 2017 ).…”

Section: Practical Uses Of Lab As An Immunostimulant In Finfish Aquacmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A complex and dynamic community of microorganisms, play important roles within the fish gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Of the bacteria colonizing the GI tract, are lactic acid bacteria (LAB) generally considered as favorable microorganism due to their abilities to stimulating host GI development, digestive function, mucosal tolerance, stimulating immune response, and improved disease resistance. In early finfish studies, were culture-dependent methods used to enumerate bacterial population levels within the GI tract. However, due to limitations by using culture methods, culture-independent techniques have been used during the last decade. These investigations have revealed the presence of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Carnobacterium, Weissella, and Pediococcus as indigenous species. Numerous strains of LAB isolated from finfish are able to produce antibacterial substances toward different potential fish pathogenic bacteria as well as human pathogens. LAB are revealed be the most promising bacterial genera as probiotic in aquaculture. During the decade numerous investigations are performed on evaluation of probiotic properties of different genus and species of LAB. Except limited contradictory reports, most of administered strains displayed beneficial effects on both, growth—and reproductive performance, immune responses and disease resistance of finfish. This eventually led to industrial scale up and introduction LAB-based commercial probiotics. Pathogenic LAB belonging to the genera Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Carnobacterium, and Lactococcus have been detected from ascites, kidney, liver, heart, and spleen of several finfish species. These pathogenic bacteria will be addressed in present review which includes their impacts on finfish aquaculture, possible routes for treatment. Finfish share many common structures and functions of the immune system with warm-blooded animals, although apparent differences exist. This similarity in the immune system may result in many shared LAB effects between finfish and land animals. LAB-fed fish show an increase in innate immune activities leading to disease resistances: neutrophil activity, lysozyme secretion, phagocytosis, and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α). However, some LAB strains preferentially induces IL-10 instead, a potent anti-inflammatory cytokine. These results indicate that LAB may vary in their immunological effects depending on the species and hosts. So far, the immunological studies using LAB have been focused on their effects on innate immunity. However, these studies need to be further extended by investigating their involvement in the modulation of adaptive immunity. The present review paper focuses on recent findings in the field of isolation and detection of LAB, their administration as probiotic in aquaculture and their interaction with fish immune responses. Furthermore, the mode of action of probiotics on finfish are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Lab As Probioticsupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Pathogenic Labmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Practical Uses Of Lab As An Immunostimulant In Finfish Aquacmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this context, it is mandatory to find immune‐modulating compounds which able to boost the immune system of farmed animals (Dawood & Koshio, ; Magnadottir, ; Oliva‐Teles, ; Pohlenz & Gatlin, ). Among different immunostimulants, prebiotics have been considered as excellent substances in promoting both host growth and well‐being (Daniels & Hoseinifar, ; Dawood, Koshio, Ishikawa & Yokoyama, ; Hoseinifar, Esteban, Cuesta & Sun, ; Hoseinifar, Ringø, Shenavar Masouleh & Esteban, ; Kiron, ; Lauzon, Dimitroglou, Merrifield, Ringø & Davies, ; Oliva‐Teles, ; Ringø, Dimitroglou, Hoseinifar & Davies, ; Song et al., ; Van Doan, Doolgindachbaporn & Suksri, ). Prebiotics are non‐digestible dietary supplement which has beneficial effects on host through modulation of gut microbiota towards potentially beneficial populations (Gatlin, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among them, galactooligosaccharide (GOS), fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and inulin (INL) have been considered the promising prebiotics (Ringø & Song, ). These prebiotics have been demonstrated to improve growth performance, immune response, stress resistance, disease resistance, metabolism of health‐promoting bacteria present in the host gut in various fish species (Hoseinifar, Esteban et al., ; Song et al., ), (Akrami, Iri, Khoshbavar Rostami & Razeghi Mansour, ; Burr, Hume, Ricke, Nisbet & Gatlin, ; Cerezuela, Cuesta, Meseguer & Ángeles Esteban, ; Guerreiro, Pérez‐Jiménez, Costas & Oliva‐Teles, ; Hoseinifar, Soleimani & Ringø, ; Mahious, Gatesoupe, Hervi, Metailler & Ollevier, ; Reza, Abdolmajid, Abbas & Abdolmohammad, ; Soleimani, Hoseinifar, Merrifield, Barati & Abadi, ; Tiengtam, Khempaka, Paengkoum & Boonanuntanasarn, ; Van Doan et al., ; Wu et al., ; Zhang et al., , , , ). In common carp, the administration of different prebiotics, such as chitosan, mannan, glucans, FOS, short‐chain FOS (Sc‐FOS) and INL (Dawood & Koshio, ; Ebrahimi et al., ; Eshaghzadeh, Hoseinifar, Vahabzadeh & Ringø, ; Gopalakannan & Arul, ; Gupta et al., ; Hoseinifar, Eshaghzadeh, Vahabzadeh & Peykaran, ; Hoseinifar et al., ; Kuhlwein et al., ; Lin et al., ), has been investigated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The study of antioxidant enzymes and immune-related genes expression in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings fed different prebiotics

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the present study was to study the effects of different prebiotics (galacto‐, fructooligosaccharide and inulin) on immune response and oxidative stress of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings at the molecular level. A total number of 240 fish (13.85 ± 0.85 g) were supplied and randomly stocked in twelve fiberglass tanks (20 specimens per tank). Fish were fed a basal formulated diet (Control) or basal diet supplemented with equal level (2%) of different prebiotics (four treatments repeated in triplicated) for 8 weeks. At the end of feeding trial, the expression of immune‐related genes (interleukin 1 beta [IL‐1β], IL‐8, IL‐10, lysozyme [LYZ], tumour necrosis factor alpha [TNF‐α] and transforming growth factor beta [TGF‐β]) were determined in head kidney and intestine tissues and the expression of antioxidant‐related genes (glutathione S‐transferase [GST‐α], glutathione reductase [GR] and glutathione peroxidase genes [GPX]) were studied in intestine. The results revealed that dietary administration of prebiotics modulated the expression of immune‐related genes and the degree of expression was affected by the type of prebiotics and the organ that was used for analyses. Also, evaluation of antioxidant genes expression showed that GSTα and GR expression levels increased as a result of feeding common carp with the prebiotics. According to these findings, it can be concluded that feeding on different prebiotics had altered effects on the expression of immune and antioxidant‐related genes.

show abstract

Effects of Eryngii mushroom (Pleurotus eryngii) and Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, immunity and disease resistance of Pangasius catfish (Pangasius bocourti, Sauvage 1880)

Doolgindachbaporn

Suksri

2016

Fish Physiol Biochem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of Eryngii mushroom, Pleurotus eryngii (PE), and Lactobacillus plantarum single or combined on growth, innate immune response and disease resistance of the Pangasius catfish, Pangasius bocourti. Two hundred forty fish were divided into four treatments, i.e., 0 g kg(-1) PE (Control, Diet 1), 3 g kg(-1) PE (Diet 2), 10(8) cfu g(-1) L. plantarum (Diet 3) and 3 g kg(-1) PE + 10(8) cfu g(-1) L. plantarum (Diet 4). Fish were culture in glass tanks with water volume approximately of 150 l, and each treatment had four replications with 15 fish per replication. Following 30, 60 and 90 days of the feeding trial, specific growth rate (SGR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), serum lysozyme, phagocytosis and respiratory burst activities were measured. SGR and FCR were significantly improved in fish fed supplemented diets after 90 days of the feeding trial. Serum lysozyme, phagocytosis and respiratory burst activity of fish were significantly stimulated by both PE and L. plantarum diets; however, the highest innate immune response was observed in fish fed synbiotic diet. At the end of the experiment, five fish were randomly selected for a challenge test against Aeromonas hydrophila. The post-challenge survival rate of the fish fed supplemented diets was significantly greater than the control treatment, and the highest post-challenge survival rate was observed in synbiotic diet. The results revealed that dietary supplementation of PE and L. plantarum stimulated growth, immunity and disease resistance of the P. bocourti.

show abstract

Effect ofLactobacillus plantarumand Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) on growth performance, immunity and disease resistance of Pangasius catfish (Pangasius bocourti,Sauvage 1880)

Cited by 34 publications

References 103 publications

Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update

Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update

The study of antioxidant enzymes and immune-related genes expression in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings fed different prebiotics

Effects of Eryngii mushroom (Pleurotus eryngii) and Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, immunity and disease resistance of Pangasius catfish (Pangasius bocourti, Sauvage 1880)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About