2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ibuprofen vs acetaminophen on postpartum hypertension in preeclampsia with severe features: a double-masked, randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study was excluded after assessment of the full text because it evaluated the dose-dependent effects of ibuprofen on blood pressure postpartum but did not include a control group 22 . Therefore, this systematic review was based on 10 studies, comprising a total of 1647 patients [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . All studies were evaluated qualitatively and eight of them were included in the quantitative meta-analysis.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One study was excluded after assessment of the full text because it evaluated the dose-dependent effects of ibuprofen on blood pressure postpartum but did not include a control group 22 . Therefore, this systematic review was based on 10 studies, comprising a total of 1647 patients [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . All studies were evaluated qualitatively and eight of them were included in the quantitative meta-analysis.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes of the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment for the five RCTs are depicted in Figure 2. Briefly, three RCTs 26,28,32 were at low risk of bias in all domains, one open-label RCT 25 raised concerns owing to lack of participant and personnel blinding and lack of blinding of outcome assessment, and the other presented a high risk of attrition bias owing to failure to recruit the predefined sample size, and was terminated prematurely 23 . The results of the ROBINS-I tool assessment for the five cohort studies are presented in Table 2, indicating that the overall risk of bias ranged from low to moderate.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations