Effect of implant design in immediate loading. A randomized, controlled, split‐mouth, prospective clinical trial

Abstract

The tapered implant achieved greater primary stability values measured with ITVs and less marginal bone loss than the cylindrical implants.

Stability of tapered and parallel‐walled dental implants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…Titles and abstracts were assessed independently and in duplicate by two review authors (M.A. Of the five included studies, three were conducted in the United States, [33][34][35] one in Spain, 36 and one in Brazil. Only 11 studies were eligible for full-text evaluation, of which, six studies were excluded.…”

“…Age 18 35 or > 21 years of age. [33][34][35][36][37] 3. Periodontally and systemically healthy participants.…”

“…Periodontally and systemically healthy participants. Fully edentulous mandible, 36 partially edentulous anterior maxilla, 33,34 anterior mandible, 33 posterior maxilla 35 or posterior mandible. Adequate plaque control with full-mouth plaque scores and fullmouth bleeding scores of 25%.…”

“…Adequate plaque control with full-mouth plaque scores and fullmouth bleeding scores of 25%. Adequate quantity and quality of native bone [34][35][36][37] or grafted bone. Fully edentulous mandible, 36 partially edentulous anterior maxilla, 33,34 anterior mandible, 33 posterior maxilla 35 or posterior mandible.…”

Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis: A systematic review

“…30 One article was published in Hebrew, 26 and all the others in English. 1,[22][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32] The participants of the reviewed studies were of both genders, and age ranged from 20 to 87 years. The main characteristics of the 12 articles are summarized in There was no statistically significant correlation between ISQ and insertion torque (r s 5 .366; P 5 .079) (Figure 4).…”