Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system

Abstract

A computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system is one of the support tools to place implant with appropriate alignment and position in total hip arthroplasty (THA). To determine whether the higher performance of the navigation would further improve the accuracy of implant placement in the clinical setting, we retrospectively compared the navigation accuracy of two different versions of a navigation system. The newer version of the navigation system had an upgraded optical sensor with superior positional accuracy. Navigation accuracy, defined as differences between postoperative measurements on CT images and intraoperative records on the navigation system, of 49 THAs performed with the newer version of the navigation system was compared with that of 49 THAs performed with the older version. With the newer version, the mean absolute accuracy (95% limits of agreement) of implant alignment was 1.2° (± 3.3°) for cup inclination, 1.0° (± 2.4°) for cup anteversion, 2.0° (± 4.9°) for stem anteversion, and 1.1° (± 2.4°) for stem valgus angle. The accuracy of the implant position was 1.5 mm (± 3.1 mm), 1.3 mm (± 3.0 mm), and 1.5 mm (± 3.1 mm) for cup x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively, 1.6 mm (± 3.2 mm), 1.4 mm (± 2.9 mm), and 1.5 mm (± 2.7 mm) for stem x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively, and 2.4 mm (± 4.5 mm) for leg length discrepancy. The values for the newer version were significantly more accurate with less variation compared to those of the older version. With upgraded navigation performance, more accurate implant placement was demonstrated in the clinical setting.

An accelerometer-based navigation system provides acetabular cup orientation accuracy comparable to that of computed tomography-based navigation during total hip arthroplasty in the supine position

“…The value of imageless navigation in avoiding radiation exposure has been reported [7,19]. The mean errors in inclination and cup anteversion with imageless navigation in THA were 6.8°and 3.7°, respectively [15]. Kalteis et al [19] reported that for patients with anatomical abnormalities such as acetabular dysplasia, imageless navigation imparted a number of disadvantages compared with CT-based navigation.…”

“…CT-based navigation is useful for positioning implants in the correct alignment and orientation during THA, and newer navigation systems enable more accurate implant positioning [15]. CT-based navigation can help achieve correct cup orientation irrespective of operator experience [16].…”

Three-dimensional computer-assisted corrective osteotomy with a patient-specific surgical guide for an antebrachial limb deformity in two dogs

“…Furthermore, as extensively demonstrated in human medicine (REF computer assisted vs freehand), computer assisted-surgeries could be more accurate and faster than free-hand techniques when performing osteotomy 13 fracture fixation 17 , joint replacement surgery 11 and vertebral screw placement as well 5 .…”

An accelerometer-based navigation system provides acetabular cup orientation accuracy comparable to that of computed tomography-based navigation during total hip arthroplasty in the supine position

“…The value of imageless navigation in avoiding radiation exposure has been reported [7,19]. The mean errors in inclination and cup anteversion with imageless navigation in THA were 6.8º and 3.7º, respectively [13]. Kalteis et al [19] reported that for patients with anatomical abnormalities such as acetabular dysplasia, imageless navigation imparted a number of disadvantages compared with CTbased navigation.…”

“…CT-based navigation is useful for positioning implants in the correct alignment and orientation during THA, and newer navigation systems enable more accurate implant positioning [13]. CT-based navigation can help achieve correct cup orientation irrespective of operator experience [14].…”