2014
DOI: 10.1260/1747-9541.9.5.1169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of In-Season Generic and Soccer-Specific High-Intensity Interval Training in Young Soccer Players

Abstract: The main purpose of this study was to determine the effect of different interval training regimes on the physical capacity and soccer-specific skills of young soccer players. Twenty-two subjects were divided into two groups: small-sided games group (SSGG; age: 15.8 ± 0.63 y, body mass: 61.6 ± 8.97 kg, height: 175.0 ± 6.23 cm) or interval-running group (IRG; age: 15.8 ± 0.55 y, body mass: 62.7 ± 8.69 kg, height: 177.6 ± 6.48 cm). The groups completed two different 8-week training programs. The intervention cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We tentatively suggest that neither players or coaches would be as motivated to increase intensity in this way when undertaking CET only. In contrast to the findings of Jastrzebski et al [25], Eniseler et al [23], found larger effects with CET than they did in SSGs. The researchers speculated on a number of different potential explanations on the discrepancy in performances between the groups, the most compelling of which relates to the motivation of athletes to take full part in training.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We tentatively suggest that neither players or coaches would be as motivated to increase intensity in this way when undertaking CET only. In contrast to the findings of Jastrzebski et al [25], Eniseler et al [23], found larger effects with CET than they did in SSGs. The researchers speculated on a number of different potential explanations on the discrepancy in performances between the groups, the most compelling of which relates to the motivation of athletes to take full part in training.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Whilst the within-and between-mode analyses both reveal SSG training and CET to be equally effective in enhancing endurance performance in male youth soccer players, some of the effect sizes seen in individual studies warrant further investigation. Jastrzebski et al [25] found that SSGs exerted a moderate effect on performance whilst CET resulted only in a borderline trivial-small effect size. The authors reported that both groups experienced similar changes in V O2max but inspection of the effect sizes in our meta-analyses suggests that this was not the case (0.82 [SSG] vs. 0.21 [CET]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While HR‐based HIT interventions have not been successful in improving aerobic performance of soccer players in some studies (Jastrzebski et al, 2014; Radziminski et al, 2013), VIFT‐based HIT approaches have always been beneficial (Buchheit et al, 2009; Campos‐Vazquez et al, 2017; Dellal et al, 2012; Harrison et al, 2015; Rabbani and Buchheit, 2015). Therefore, the results of the present study together with findings from previous studies in which VIFT has been used as a reference for individualizing HIT (Buchheit et al, 2009; Campos‐Vazquez et al, 2017; Dellal et al, 2012; Harrison et al, 2015; Rabbani and Buchheit, 2015) suggest that using speed‐based HIT is an efficient method for improving high‐intensity intermittent running performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…high-intensity interval training) and SSGs [4][5][6]. Moreover, long-term adaptations after specific training programs based on traditional running activities and SSGs have also shown similar improvements in both methods [7,8]. For these reasons, the similarity between running activities and SSGs has led to a preference of the the latter owing to their specificity for soccer training [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%