2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Increased Coronal Inclination of the Tibial Plateau After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
123
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
123
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Saragaglia et al 18 showed excellent results among 42 double-level osteotomy cases when the JLO was restricted to <5°. However, Akamatsu et al 1 recently found that in cases of medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) ≥95°, which corresponded to JLO of 5° in their study, no difference was seen in cartilage findings during second-look arthroscopy at 1 year postoperatively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Saragaglia et al 18 showed excellent results among 42 double-level osteotomy cases when the JLO was restricted to <5°. However, Akamatsu et al 1 recently found that in cases of medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) ≥95°, which corresponded to JLO of 5° in their study, no difference was seen in cartilage findings during second-look arthroscopy at 1 year postoperatively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Currently, the most commonly accepted limit of JLO is 4°; however, literature to support this value is lacking. Adverse effects of JLO have mostly been demonstrated in cases of proximal tibial osteotomy addressing valgus deformity, 5,20 and only finite element analysis 14 or short-term studies 1 have been performed for cases of varus deformity corrected by OWHTO. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to determine the acceptable range of JLO in terms of radiologic and clinical aspects by assessing the midterm outcomes of OWHTO according to JLO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The force value becomes even higher as the obliquity angle increases. Although some studies have shown that there was no difference of short-term outcome with high-degree obliquity [8,23,24], it is reasonable there would be a long-term adverse effect on the articular cartilage [12]. Lee et al found that the change of KJLO was signi cantly less than that of anatomical geometry of the proximal tibia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the mean change in the mechanical axis was 14.6 in the patellofemoral degenerative progression group; I believe that this large correction angle caused abnormal joint line obliquity, which could have resulted in the inferior clinical outcomes in the progression group. Akamatsu et al 10 and Schuster et al 11 reported that overcorrected medial proximal tibial angle exerted a negative impact on the clinical outcomes after OWHTO. Second, patients were divided per their patellofemoral degenerative progression from first to second arthroscopy (mean interval: 21.4 months), not at the final follow-up.…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 1703mentioning
confidence: 99%