2020
DOI: 10.17582/journal.pjz/20190518090547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Indigenous Probiotics on Gut Morphology and Intestinal Absorption Capacity in Broiler Chicken Challenged with Salmonella enteritidis

Abstract: Authors' Contribution MN, MUD and MR designed the project. IK and MAA collected samples. IK and AM executed experiments. MN and AAA analysed data. AM, IK and MN prepared the manuscript.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The commercial probiotics used in our study were derived from an unknown host, whereas the indigenous bacteria were recovered from the intestines of poultry birds. The advantages of indigenous L. reuteri and E. faecium on broiler growth performance are consistent with other studies in broiler chickens using different indigenous probiotic strains such as Lactobacillus, Bacillus, and Enterococcus (15,35,36). This may result from beneficial effects of indigenous lactic acid bacterial (LAB) strains on intestinal microflora and morphology, improving nutrient digestibility and absorption (37).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The commercial probiotics used in our study were derived from an unknown host, whereas the indigenous bacteria were recovered from the intestines of poultry birds. The advantages of indigenous L. reuteri and E. faecium on broiler growth performance are consistent with other studies in broiler chickens using different indigenous probiotic strains such as Lactobacillus, Bacillus, and Enterococcus (15,35,36). This may result from beneficial effects of indigenous lactic acid bacterial (LAB) strains on intestinal microflora and morphology, improving nutrient digestibility and absorption (37).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%