1991
DOI: 10.1136/thx.46.9.633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of inhaled prostaglandin E2 on bronchial reactivity to sodium metabisulphite and methacholine in patients with asthma.

Abstract: Inhaled frusemide protects against the bronchoconstrictor response to a wide range of stimuli that cause bronchoconstriction by indirect mechanisms. One possible explanation for this protection relates to the known ability of frusemide to enhance synthesis of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Studies in vitro suggest that PGE2 might protect against indirectly acting bronchoconstrictor challenges rather than those that act directly on airway smooth muscle, though little is known about the effects of PGE2 in vivo. The ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of significant correlation might be based on the fact that PGE 2 inhibits challenges that work indirectly via neural pathways or mediator release but not those that act predominantly via a direct action on airway smooth muscle, such as histamine and metacholine [2,3]. The above theory is partially supported by previous observations that PGE 2 inhibits acetylcholine release from cholinergic nerves [25], represents the ultimate mediator of airway smooth muscle relaxation produced by activation of sensory nerve inhibitory system [26], but fails to protect against bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine [27]. Another plausible explanation might be based on the theory that the inhibitory effect of PGE 2 in histamine-induced contraction appears to be concentration-dependent [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The absence of significant correlation might be based on the fact that PGE 2 inhibits challenges that work indirectly via neural pathways or mediator release but not those that act predominantly via a direct action on airway smooth muscle, such as histamine and metacholine [2,3]. The above theory is partially supported by previous observations that PGE 2 inhibits acetylcholine release from cholinergic nerves [25], represents the ultimate mediator of airway smooth muscle relaxation produced by activation of sensory nerve inhibitory system [26], but fails to protect against bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine [27]. Another plausible explanation might be based on the theory that the inhibitory effect of PGE 2 in histamine-induced contraction appears to be concentration-dependent [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Under different circumstances COX products may have a protective role. PGE 2 has been shown to have a potential bronchoprotective role both in vitro [6,7] and in vivo [8,9]. Studies showing that oral indomethacin inhibits refractoriness to repeated bronchoconstriction challenge suggest that endogenous PGE 2 may be involved in this protective response [10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two of the three separate experiments performed with PF-5212372, no apparent inhibition was observed with up to 1 M PF-5212372. This is of great interest because of the apparent bronchoprotective effects of PGE 2 in the lung (Pavord et al, 1991;Sestini et al, 1996;Szczeklik et al, 1996;Vancheri et al, 2004). If PF-5212372 is able to spare lung inhibition of PGE 2 in a clinical setting, this may be of great benefit (Mathison and Koziol, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%