2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-018-3216-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Initial Surface Features on Laser Polishing of Co-Cr-Mo Alloy Made by Powder-Bed Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The materials used are cobalt‐chromium alloys (CoCr), inconel 718, tool steel H13, titanium Ti6Al‐4 V, aluminium AlSi10Mg and corrosion resistant steel 316 L. Figure 2 gives an overview of the surface roughness before and after laser polishing. [5, 20–40]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The materials used are cobalt‐chromium alloys (CoCr), inconel 718, tool steel H13, titanium Ti6Al‐4 V, aluminium AlSi10Mg and corrosion resistant steel 316 L. Figure 2 gives an overview of the surface roughness before and after laser polishing. [5, 20–40]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is presumably a consequence of the remelting process. Similar to laser polishing using continuous wave laser radiation [34][35][36], multiple processing steps lead to a reduction of the height of surface features due to material redistribution. This material redistribution primarily due to capillary forces-counteracts the surface structure formation in the WaveShape process.…”
Section: Number Of Repetitions and Process Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grinding was performed until the surface quality stopped improving for that grit size grinding paper, which took approximately two minutes.microThe laser polishing was performed on the sides of the 90 sample (surface orthogonal to the build layer) using a 200 W, 1070 nm fiber laser (SPI Lasers, SP-200C-W-S6-A-B) that was operated in continuous-wave mode. The laser polishing conditions were based on those used in previous studies [7], and a by 1 mm area was polished. The nominal laser processing parameters include a beam diameter of 100 m, a beam scanning velocity of 200 mm/s, a laser power of 80 W, and a spacing distance between subsequent laser lines of 60 m. The laser traveled in the same direction for every line and scan.…”
Section: Surface Post-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%