Tailings and Mine Waste '04 2004
DOI: 10.1201/9780203021637.ch25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of inocula on heavy metal removal by sulfate-reducing columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrates the influence of microbial inoculum in the removal of sulfates and metals from AMD and supports our previous findings in column experiments (Messner, 2004). Bottles inoculated with LUTR inoculum collected from a field PRZ showed the best overall performance and demonstrated the highest metal removal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study demonstrates the influence of microbial inoculum in the removal of sulfates and metals from AMD and supports our previous findings in column experiments (Messner, 2004). Bottles inoculated with LUTR inoculum collected from a field PRZ showed the best overall performance and demonstrated the highest metal removal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Five different inocula were used for this study: twice-acclimated inoculum from a sulfatereducing column simulating a PRZ (Messner et al, 2004), dairy manure, anaerobic digester sludge, and inocula taken from two sulfate-reducing bioreactors operated in the field (Luttrell and Peerless Jenny King, near Helena, MT, kindly provided by Jim Gusek of Golder Associates, Inc.). Anaerobic digester sludge samples were obtained from the Drake Water Reclamation Facility of the city of Fort Collins, CO. Fresh dairy manure was obtained from La Luna dairy, Wellington, CO.…”
Section: Candidate Inoculamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations