Article Dąbrowski et al., see p. 181 The first alcohol septal ablation (ASA) for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) was performed by Ulrich Sigwart, and the description of the procedure was published in The Lancet in 1995 [1]. Currently, based on the increasing body of evidence, it is known that severe and symptomatic left ventricular obstruction usually needs effective mechanical relief in the form of septal reduction therapy (ASA or myectomy) [2]. The technique of ASA involves an injection of a small amount (1-3 mL) of desiccated alcohol into an appropriate septal branch [3-6]. The rapid postprocedural pressure gradient decrease is caused mainly by stunning and myocardial necrosis. However, the main mechanism of the continuous pressure gradient relief is the widening of the left ventricular outflow tract developing secondarily to infarction and fibrosis of the basal septum. Subsequently, the basal septal shrinking is followed by a gradual reduction in the left ventricular mass, improvement of the diastolic function, and reduction in the degree of mitral regurgitation [3-7]. Also, successful procedures lead to an improvement in symptoms of angina pectoris and dyspnoea [3-7]. The first European multinational study focused on early outcomes of ASA undoubtedly demonstrated its clinical efficacy, but the safety of this interventional procedure was limited as complete heart blocks occurred in one-third of the procedures and one-tenth of the patients needed permanent pacing after ASA [7, 8]. It was also found that in the younger HOCM patients, characterised by a thicker basal septum, post-ASA haemodynamic improvement was slower, but the procedure was effective irrespective of the age of the treated patients [9]. Although encouraging results of single-centre or national ASA registries were published in the first two decades after the first procedure performed by Sigwart, the long-term safety and efficacy of ASA have been a matter of ongoing debate.