Temporal structure reveals the potential adaptive strategies employed during upper extremity movements. The authors compared the temporal structure of upper extremity joints under 3 different reaching conditions: preferred speed, fast speed, and reaching with rhythmic auditory cues in 10 individuals post-stroke. They also investigated the temporal structure of these 3 reaching conditions in 8 healthy controls to aid in the interpretation of the observed patterns in the poststroke cohort. Approximate entropy (ApEn) was used to measure the temporal structure of the upper extremity joints. ApEn was similar between conditions in controls. After stroke, ApEn was significantly higher for shoulder, elbow, and wrist both at fast speed and with rhythmic cues compared with preferred speed. ApEn at index finger was significantly higher only with rhythmic cues compared with preferred speed. The authors propose that practice reaching at faster speed and with rhythmic cues as a component of rehabilitation interventions may enhance adaptability after stroke. Keywords nonlinear; rhythm; stroke; temporal structure; upper extremity Stroke is the leading cause of adult-onset disability in the United States (American Heart Association, 2016). Up to 85% of individuals with stroke exhibit upper extremity (UE) paresis immediately poststroke (Kwakkel & Kollen, 2007;Kwakkel, Kollen, van der Grond, & Prevo, 2003;Olsen, 1990). Recent advances in our understanding of the principles of neuroplasticity provide motivation for development of interventions enhancing UE function in stroke survivors (Jang et al., 2003;Liepert, Graef, Uhde, Leidner, & Weiller, 2000; Correspondence address: Amit Sethi, Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 5019 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. asethi@pitt.edu.
HHS Public AccessAuthor manuscript J Mot Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 January 01.
Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Sawaki et al., 2008;Wolf et al., 2006). Regrettably, despite advanced rehabilitation approaches, residual UE impairments still persist. Current clinical assessment tools do not sensitively quantify the underlying motor impairments, limiting the ability to detect clinically important change in response to rehabilitation interventions. Insights provided by contemporary analyses are needed to better detect motor impairments and develop potentially more targeted and effective rehabilitation interventions after stroke.While clinical and biomechanical (kinematic) assessments of UE movements are typically used to characterize motor impairments, measures that quantify movement variability offer a unique advantage to assess motor adaptability during performance of everyday tasks (Stergiou & Decker, 2011). However, these approaches have received less attention in clinical motor assessment and rehabilitation studies. Variability in reaching movements, which is characterized by the ability to u...