2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of intensive vs. free range production on the fat and fatty acid composition of whole birds and edible portions of retail chickens in the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The report by Jahan et al (2004), that demonstrated that organic breast meat had a significantly lower contents of n-3 fatty acids, but a higher content of total PUFA, n-6 and n-6/n-3 ratios, is in full agreement with the present findings. Also, a recent study showed that free-range meat contained lower quantities of most n-3 fatty acids (C18:3, C18:4, EPA) and had a consistently higher n-6/n-3 ratio than that from intensively reared birds (Givens et al, 2011). It has been suggested that broiler chicks in an organic system are usually exposed to more and different environmental factors compared with the conventional indoor systems; hence, they might have utilized omega-3 as an essential nutrient to support their immune system against external stimulations, rather than deposit it in the meat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The report by Jahan et al (2004), that demonstrated that organic breast meat had a significantly lower contents of n-3 fatty acids, but a higher content of total PUFA, n-6 and n-6/n-3 ratios, is in full agreement with the present findings. Also, a recent study showed that free-range meat contained lower quantities of most n-3 fatty acids (C18:3, C18:4, EPA) and had a consistently higher n-6/n-3 ratio than that from intensively reared birds (Givens et al, 2011). It has been suggested that broiler chicks in an organic system are usually exposed to more and different environmental factors compared with the conventional indoor systems; hence, they might have utilized omega-3 as an essential nutrient to support their immune system against external stimulations, rather than deposit it in the meat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many consumers who believe that free‐range or organic meat products are healthier (Van Loo et al., 2010), this result may be unexpected. However, since the study (Givens et al., 2011) was based on meat purchased from supermarkets, the diets of chickens are unknown and, as a consequence, the reasons behind the PUFA differences cannot be completely ascertained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, no manipulations were made to derive the meat yield. Fatty acid composition was taken from Givens, Gibbs, Rymer, and Brown (2011), who used whole cooked chickens for their meat analysis. Although cooked meat could potentially lose a portion of PUFA content as a consequence of oxidation, recent research has demonstrated that these losses are likely to be minimal (Douny et al., 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research suggests that farmed fish such as salmon have the ability to generate their own longchain n-3 PUFA when the diet is limiting (Sanden et al 2011). Approximately 35-45% of chicken and other poultry fat is MUFA, between 22 and 27% of the fat is CISFA, 13-26% of fat is PUFA depending on species and method of rearing, but there can be large changes in long-chain n-3 PUFA if the ration contains higher levels of a-linolenic acid (Chartrin et al 2006;Jia et al 2010;Givens et al 2011). In pigs there are smaller changes in stearic acid, MUFA and PUFA with different rations and genotypes than in chickens but CISFA are~27% of the fat and can as low as 21% for free-range pigs (Rodríguez-Sánchez et al 2010;Razmaite et al 2011;Barea et al 2013).…”
Section: Recommendations For Animal Industriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demand for leaner meat has led to some distortions in selection and production goals. From poultry to cattle, animals are selected for more meat and less fat (Abasht et al 2006;Lagarrigue et al 2006;Givens et al 2011), and meat is presented with more fat trimmed from the cuts. This has led to fat being discarded and, in some cases, excess animal fat burned for fuel (Fairlie 2010), which is wasted production.…”
Section: Recommendations For Animal Industriesmentioning
confidence: 99%