2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3610513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of interface roughness on acoustic loss in tunable thin film bulk acoustic wave resonators

Abstract: Tunable 5.2 GHz bulk acoustic wave resonators utilizing Ba(x)Sr(1-x)TiO(3) ferroelectric films with similar intrinsic properties but different interface roughness are fabricated and characterized. Increase in roughness from 3.2 nm up to 6.9 nm results in reduction in Q-factor from 350 down to 150 due to extrinsic acoustic losses caused by wave scattering at reflections from rough interfaces and other mechanisms associated with roughness. The increased roughness is a result of distortion of Pt bottom electrode … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, processing induced differences in microstructure and interface roughness could also impact the piezoelectric response. 15,16 The DC electric field dependence of the permittivity, the tunability, is shown in Figure 3. Table I provides the calculated tunability and unbiased dielectric loss tangent at 100 kHz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, processing induced differences in microstructure and interface roughness could also impact the piezoelectric response. 15,16 The DC electric field dependence of the permittivity, the tunability, is shown in Figure 3. Table I provides the calculated tunability and unbiased dielectric loss tangent at 100 kHz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed initial 3-dB frequency drop at ~1 GHz, followed by the non-monotonic response from 2 to 7 GHz, could possibly be explained by acousto-optical interactions, and acoustic resonances confined by the coplanar waveguide electrodes [17,30,31]. This behavior has been observed in other thin film LN modulators as well [17], and can be alleviated by a slight roughening of the LN surface [32].…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The thickness mode components q and c 0 for different orientations of the Ba 0.5 Sr 0.5 TiO 3 and Ba 0.3 Sr 0.7 TiO 3 compositions are listed in Table 1 [14]. The proportionality factors A t between the non-loaded electromechanical coupling coefficient and the relative tunability of permittivity, calculated using (4) and (10), are also listed.…”
Section: C) Piezoelectric Effect Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%