2017
DOI: 10.1177/1056789517724857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of interfacial debonding on stress transfer in graphene reinforced polymer nanocomposites

Abstract: A shear-lag analysis hybrid cohesive zone model is employed to investigate the stress transfer from polymer matrix to the graphene by considering the interfacial damage and debonding phenomena in graphene reinforced polymer nanocomposites. The applied stress can produce three cases for interface treatment: entirely intact, damaged and debonded. By using analytical derived relations, the distribution of axial stress in the graphene and interfacial shear stress at the three-mentioned states is determined and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows the RVE models as single and randomly distributed graphene/epoxy nanocomposites. The outputs of the developing algorithm in this study are applied to the RVE model in Figure 7 Since the study from the litreture (Heidarhaei et al, 2020) was considered, neat, 0.1 and 0.2 wt% graphene/epoxy nanocomposites were modelled using RVE technique. Experimental results were compared with two different numerical models as single and randomly distributed graphene nanocomposites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 shows the RVE models as single and randomly distributed graphene/epoxy nanocomposites. The outputs of the developing algorithm in this study are applied to the RVE model in Figure 7 Since the study from the litreture (Heidarhaei et al, 2020) was considered, neat, 0.1 and 0.2 wt% graphene/epoxy nanocomposites were modelled using RVE technique. Experimental results were compared with two different numerical models as single and randomly distributed graphene nanocomposites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a mode I fracture, which has been shown not to be a predominant mechanism [18,19], we have used the following para meters, extracted from the mentioned works:…”
Section: Results and Discussion Influence Of Angular Distortions And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same fashion as other authors [18,19], we consider mode II as predominant. We use the same stiffness value for the in plane and out of plane stiffnesses.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage evolution in fibrous composites mainly includes pull-out of fibers (Bechel and Sottos, 1998;Jiang et al, 2018;Lin et al, 2001;Park et al, 2017;Tsai and Kim, 1996), crack propagation in matrix and fracture of fibers (Brinson, 1999;Jin et al, 2017;Kumar and Talreja, 2003;Mihai et al, 2016;Okabe et al, 2017;Vorobiev et al, 2017;Voyiadjis and Deliktas, 2000;Wu and Ohno, 1999), and interfacial debonding (Caiazzo and Costanzo, 2000;Han et al, 2001;Harik and Cairncross, 2000;Heidarhaei et al, 2017;Li, 2018;Nedjar, 2014;Pupurs and Varna, 2015;Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%