2004
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2004.833953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Interfacial Oxide Thickness on 1/f Noise in Polysilicon Emitter BJTs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While 1/f noise in the bulk device follows a clear I B 2 dependence, the SiGe HBT-on-SOI shows a I B 2 trend only at high I B , with a linear dependence on I B at low base currents, suggesting that in this current range noise may originate from carrier mobility fluctuations. The I B dependent 1/f noise spectrum is consistent with the presence of a large leakage current due to space-charge region G/R recombination centers, as observed in [15,16] and in previous studies on the proton radiation response in bulk SiGe HBTs [11,13].…”
Section: /T (K1)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…While 1/f noise in the bulk device follows a clear I B 2 dependence, the SiGe HBT-on-SOI shows a I B 2 trend only at high I B , with a linear dependence on I B at low base currents, suggesting that in this current range noise may originate from carrier mobility fluctuations. The I B dependent 1/f noise spectrum is consistent with the presence of a large leakage current due to space-charge region G/R recombination centers, as observed in [15,16] and in previous studies on the proton radiation response in bulk SiGe HBTs [11,13].…”
Section: /T (K1)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The areal dependence with increasing normalized noise in npn BJTs with smaller emitter area A E is shown in Figure 2, using the SPICE parameter K F defined from The data for more than 150 devices are collected from [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], and shown in Figure 2 with some points omitted for clarity. Since the numbers spread over several decades, we use geometric averaging technique [28] to extract the trend in the data from the product A E ×K F ; and the trend is A E ×K F ≈5.6×10 -9 µm 2 with logarithmic standard deviation of σ dB =3.4dB.…”
Section: Noise In Bjtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second factor for deviation of noise level around the trend in Figure 2 can be attributed to differences in the fabrication of BJT. The impact of several technology steps on the low-frequency noise in polysilicon emitter BJTs was reviewed several times, for example in [31], and extensively analyzed in the past [18,19,20,21,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. From these studies, it is found that among the many sources that can contribute to the low-frequency noise, such as fluctuation in diffusion, surface recombination and charge trapping, the major noise source is associated with or located in the interfacial oxide (IFO) between poly and monosilicon layers in the emitter of BJT.…”
Section: Iii2 Differences In Bjt Fabrication Ifomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations