2018
DOI: 10.29252/beat-060404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Intramuscular Ketamine versus Haloperidol on Short-Term Control of Severe Agitated Patients in Emergency Department; A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intramuscular ketamine and haloperidol in sedation of severely agitated patients in emergency department (ED).  Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial study was performed on agitated patients referring to two university educational hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intramuscular (IM) haloperidol (5 mg) or IM ketamine (4 mg/kg). The primary outcome was time to adequate sedation (AMSS ≤ +1). Secondary outcomes included the need f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our trial, patients did not receive a second dose of study medications, and the need for rescue sedation was similar between trial groups. While our sedation times appear roughly similar, Heydari 31 did not employ standardized adverse event or serious adverse event reporting. However, 9 patients (10%) required endotracheal intubation (6 ketamine; 3 haloperidol), and we cannot account for the substantial difference in patient safety profile compared to our results, except that we did not permit additional dosing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our trial, patients did not receive a second dose of study medications, and the need for rescue sedation was similar between trial groups. While our sedation times appear roughly similar, Heydari 31 did not employ standardized adverse event or serious adverse event reporting. However, 9 patients (10%) required endotracheal intubation (6 ketamine; 3 haloperidol), and we cannot account for the substantial difference in patient safety profile compared to our results, except that we did not permit additional dosing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Heydari 31 randomized 90 patients to ketamine (4 mg/ kg) or haloperidol (5 mg) alone and achieved a ketamine sedation time of 7.7 minutes. However, additional half doses of the study drug were commonly administered (ketamine group 64%; haloperidol group 51%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The articles excluded by full text review are listed in Supplementary Material B. Eleven trials [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] including 27 study arms remained eligible after systematic review. Ten intramuscular drug/drug combinations were available for comparison, and haloperidol (6 trials) and midazolam (5 trials) were most frequently investigated.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] that randomized 1142 patients among 11 drug treatments (including intravenous valproate) provided data for effectiveness. Eleven studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] that randomized 1147 patients among 11 drug treatments (including intravenous valproate due to its direct comparison with haloperidol in one trial [22]) provided data for safety. Six studies [23][24][25][26]28,31] that randomized 559 patients among seven drug treatments provided data for effect onset.…”
Section: Summary Of the Network Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each syringe contained 2 mL of clear solution requiring refrigeration. We used the Altered Mental Status Scale (AMSS), a validated 14,27,28 ordinal agitation scale from −4 (coma) to 0 (normal) to + 4 (most profoundly agitated) routinely used at our institution, to quantify the severity of agitation (Table 1). Our institution is most familiar with AMSS; however, to ensure our results would be generalizable the Behavioral Activity Rating Scale (BARS; Data Supplement S1, Table S1, available as supporting information in the online version of this paper, which is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acem.14124/full) was also recorded on each patient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%