2019
DOI: 10.1177/1945892419844397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Intranasal Corticosteroids on Secondary Sinonasal Symptoms: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

Abstract: Background Intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) sprays are indicated for use in the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and include aqueous and nonaqueous formulations. Secondary symptoms of rhinitis include postnasal drip, facial pain/pressure, headache, cough, and ear fullness. The effectiveness of INCS on these specific symptoms, as well as the comparative effectiveness of aqueous and nonaqueous formulations, is poorly defined. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of aqueous versus nonaqueo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not clear if treatment of AR with INCS improves the associated cough, 3245,3250 but an RCT by Kim et al 3245 . suggests that nasal saline irrigations decrease cough associated with AR.…”
Section: Associated Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not clear if treatment of AR with INCS improves the associated cough, 3245,3250 but an RCT by Kim et al 3245 . suggests that nasal saline irrigations decrease cough associated with AR.…”
Section: Associated Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deot et al reviewed the effect of intranasal corticosteroids, aqueous versus nonaqueous formulations, on secondary sinonasal symptoms including cough, postnasal drip, facial pain/pressure, headache, and ear fullness. 7 Although in theory, nonaqueous formulations should have better drug delivery to more distal regions of the nasal cavity, despite an extensive literature search, there was very limited data comparing aqueous to nonaqueous formulations, indicating this is an area that still requires further investigation. Another form of topical steroids, mometasone furoate sinus implants, provided significant improvements in outcomes including nasal obstruction/ congestion score, bilateral polyp grade, and ethmoid sinus obstruction and potentially less need for surgical revision compared to mometasone furoate nasal spray in patients with CRS with nasal polyps.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%