Effect of intrastromal corneal ring segments on in vivo corneal biomechanics in keratoconus: 1-year results

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the 1-year effects of the implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in keratoconus (KC) on the dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters obtained with the Corvis. Setting: Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. Design: Prospective, single-center, clinical study. Methods: Included were patients who underwent ICRS implantation for KC over a period of 1 year. On the day of the surgery and at least 6 months after ICRS implantation, the following measurements were made: corrected distance and uncorrected distance visual acuity, corneal tomography indices with the Pentacam, biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and the Corvis DCRs (integrated inverse concave radius, deformation amplitude ratio, stiffness parameter at first applanation, stress–strain index [SSI] and the highest concavity radius). Results: 30 eyes were included with a mean follow-up time of 15 months. Statistical analysis showed that ICRS implantation induced significant improvements in corneal biomechanics measurements between preoperative and long-term follow-up as demonstrated by a significant increase in SSI (P = .003). To confirm that this difference was actually induced due to a stiffening between early postoperative (previously published) and long-term an additional t-test was done between month 1 and late follow-up which confirmed a significant stiffening in the value of SSI (P = .01). Conclusions: Patients implanted with ICRS alone for KC showed a significantly stiffer response due to increased structural support compared with preoperative values and 1 month postoperative.

Intraocular lens power calculation formulas: a scientometric analysis

“…Meanwhile, the light orange cluster focused on assessing the accuracy of different IOL power calculation formulas [ 41 , 42 ] . The green cluster authors concentrated on research related to keratoconus and keratoplasty procedures [ 43 , 44 ] . The pink cluster authors primarily explored aspects of quality assessment for ophthalmological patients [ 45 , 46 ] .…”