2021
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.11684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Intravenous Fluid Treatment With a Balanced Solution vs 0.9% Saline Solution on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients

Abstract: for the BaSICS investigators and the BRICNet members IMPORTANCE Intravenous fluids are used for almost all intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Clinical and laboratory studies have questioned whether specific fluid types result in improved outcomes, including mortality and acute kidney injury.OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of a balanced solution vs saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) on 90-day survival in critically ill patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Double-blind, factorial, randomized clinic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, we excluded 21 studies because of lack of appropriate outcome or population (included non-sepsis patients), secondary paper of included study, or conference abstracts of included or excluded studies. Eventually, 15 studies [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow chart that illustrates how the final studies were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, we excluded 21 studies because of lack of appropriate outcome or population (included non-sepsis patients), secondary paper of included study, or conference abstracts of included or excluded studies. Eventually, 15 studies [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow chart that illustrates how the final studies were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in the SMART randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 2018 comparing NS to BC, the sepsis cohort was associated with lower 30-day mortality with BC compared to NS (odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% CI, 0.67, 0.94) [ 10 ]. However, more recent studies have been published comparing the effect of BC vs. NS on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and revealed conflicting findings [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self et al [28] found that NS was related to major adverse kidney events within 30 days in noncritically ill adults compared with balanced crystalloids. In contrast, Zampieri et al [29] found no significant difference between balanced crystalloids and NS in critically ill patients. Moreover, a trial conducted by Cheung-Flynn et al [30] showed that NS contributed to glycocalyx degradation in a pig model of a hemorrhagic shock compared with a balanced crystalloid (Plasma-Lyte).…”
Section: Effects Of Different Resuscitation Fluids On the Glycocalyxmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These fluids (eg, Ringer's lactate, Hartmann's solution) have minimal effects on pH but are relatively hypotonic which can exacerbate edema particularly cerebral edema in the injured brain. 56 The potential utility of hypertonic crystalloids in TBI is twofold; they are potent vascular compartment expanders, and they can reduce cerebral edema. A recent RCT compared the effect of continuous hypertonic saline (20%) for 48 hours with standard hospital care on 359 patients.…”
Section: Circulation: the Optimal Resuscitation Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fluids (eg, Ringer’s lactate, Hartmann’s solution) have minimal effects on pH but are relatively hypotonic which can exacerbate edema particularly cerebral edema in the injured brain. 56 …”
Section: Circulation: the Optimal Resuscitation Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%