2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132514
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Introducing Xpert MTB/RIF to Test and Treat Individuals at Risk of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Kazakhstan: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract: BackgroundXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) was piloted in Kazakhstan to detect tuberculosis (TB) and rifampicin resistance (RR-)TB among individuals at risk of multidrug-resistant (MDR-) TB. This study assessed the performance of Xpert compared to conventional diagnostic methods, RR-TB case detection among various risk groups, treatment initiation and time to diagnosis and treatment.MethodsEligible individuals were tested with Xpert, smear microscopy, culture and drug-susceptibility testing (DST) at the national TB refer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, rifampicin resistance was detected in a total of 1289/ 3167 individual sputum specimens, translating into rifampicin resistance rates in the study population of 40.7%. Sensitivity of the assay for detection of rifampicin resistance in our study was very good (93.4%; 1212/1298), with overall specificity of 95.9% (1792/ 1869), which is consistent with earlier reports from similar settings [18,24]. Relatively minor discrepancies between Xpert MTB/RIF and phenotypic DST results (n ¼ 163; 5.1%) could be explained by the heteroresistance associated with a differential growth of drugsensitive and drug-resistant populations of M. tuberculosis coexisting in original sputum specimens, as well as by possible clerical and reporting errors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, rifampicin resistance was detected in a total of 1289/ 3167 individual sputum specimens, translating into rifampicin resistance rates in the study population of 40.7%. Sensitivity of the assay for detection of rifampicin resistance in our study was very good (93.4%; 1212/1298), with overall specificity of 95.9% (1792/ 1869), which is consistent with earlier reports from similar settings [18,24]. Relatively minor discrepancies between Xpert MTB/RIF and phenotypic DST results (n ¼ 163; 5.1%) could be explained by the heteroresistance associated with a differential growth of drugsensitive and drug-resistant populations of M. tuberculosis coexisting in original sputum specimens, as well as by possible clerical and reporting errors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In Ukraine, the introduction of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay started in 2013. Formal protocols specifying categories of patients having access to rapid molecular TB diagnosis [10], as well as the availability of the electronic national TB register [14], created means for systematic implementation of new diagnostic methods and monitoring of accurate treatment outcomes, but data on performance, clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of the rapid molecular assays in Ukraine are so far limited [9,11,13,18]. Although the study cohort cannot be considered fully representativeddue to the retrospective nature of the study and the lack of information on whether selection of patients for rapid diagnostics was in full agreement with the National guidelines [10]dour results on rifampicin resistance are in agreement with high overall rates of MDR-TB in Ukraine [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could not establish whether fluoroquinolones improved outcomes from INH-R TBM when added later in treatment based on DST, but our findings underscore the necessity for improved early drug resistance detection. The use of rapid molecular testing of pulmonary TB by Xpert MTB/RIF has facilitated early diagnosis of rifampicin resistance and second-line treatment initiation [ 22 ]. Xpert MTB/RIF has been recommended by the World Health Organization for direct use on CSF as the initial diagnostic test [ 21 , 23 ]; however, isoniazid resistance cannot be detected by the current Xpert cartridge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that Xpert MTB/RIF can detect up to 59% additional TB cases when compared to sputum smear microscopy [16][17][18]. It can also detect RR-TB as well as reduce the turnaround time from sample collection to diagnosis and treatment [19]. Inadequate access or lack of access to Xpert MTB/RIF machines was one of the main barriers for Xpert MTB/RIF testing for all eligible patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%