2015
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of invasive EEG monitoring on cognitive outcome after left temporal lobe epilepsy surgery

Abstract: Objectives: The objective of this cohort study was to compare neuropsychological outcomes following left temporal lobe resection (TLR) in patients with epilepsy who had or had not undergone prior invasive monitoring.Methods: Data were obtained from an institutional review board-approved, neuropsychology registry for patients who underwent epilepsy surgery at Cleveland Clinic between 1997 and 2013. A total of 176 patients (45 with and 131 without invasive EEG) met inclusion criteria. Primary outcome measures we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the subset of patients who returned after surgery, postoperative testing was completed an average of 8.1 months (SD 7.8) after surgery and 12.2 (SD 8.7) months after the preoperative evaluation. The average retest interval in the current study was longer than the 7.5 month (SD 3.3) average retest interval used by Martin et al for development of the RCIs, but in line with the case example used by Martin et al (ie, 11 months) and with patient samples from other studies that have characterized cognitive outcome using these RCIs …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the subset of patients who returned after surgery, postoperative testing was completed an average of 8.1 months (SD 7.8) after surgery and 12.2 (SD 8.7) months after the preoperative evaluation. The average retest interval in the current study was longer than the 7.5 month (SD 3.3) average retest interval used by Martin et al for development of the RCIs, but in line with the case example used by Martin et al (ie, 11 months) and with patient samples from other studies that have characterized cognitive outcome using these RCIs …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The average retest interval in the current study was longer than the 7.5 month (SD 3.3) average retest interval used by Martin et al 16 | 827 studies that have characterized cognitive outcome using these RCIs. [17][18][19]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ljung et al consider their study to be the first demonstrating verbal memory decline due to intrahippocampal depth electrodes. The findings contrast with studies that did not find negative cognitive effects of depth electrodes, invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring, or deep brain stimulation . However, the well‐known “placement effect” after implantations for deep brain stimulation within other target structures shows that the implantation itself can have a considerable functional effect, which seems transient but can cause measurable cognitive impairment …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…No studies have specifically examined the cognitive effects of longitudinal parasagittal vs lateral orthogonal hippocampal implantations in patients undergoing preoperative surgery evaluation, much less other types of iEEG. Busch et al addresses only patients undergoing left temporal lobe surgery, showing no effect of preoperative iEEG in these patients postoperatively, a finding consistent with left temporal lobe patients in Helmstaedter et al…”
Section: Conflicting Evidencementioning
confidence: 52%
“…The third study was conducted by Busch et al, who enrolled 176 patients with left TLE (131 without and 45 with various types of iEEG of which 37 had depth electrodes; the types of depth electrodes were not listed). The primary verbal memory measure was the Wechsler Memory Scale‐III Immediate and Delayed Auditory Memory Indices.…”
Section: Conflicting Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%