2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ionizing radiation on the pteridine metabolic pathway and evaluation of its cytotoxicity in exposed hospital staff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Erol et al (2002) observed that the ionizing radiation dose to which invasive cardiology workers were exposed did not induce an increase in the frequency of SCEs, but could induce an increase of chromosomal aberrations. Vice versa, in agreement with other previous findings (Tug et al, 2013;Engin et al, 2005;Bozkurt et al, 2003;Cardoso et al, 2001;Ray et al, 2001), our study reveals a significantly increased frequency of SCEs among radiation-exposed individuals compared to controls. A possible explanation could be that one of the consequences of the exposure to IR is the production of free radicals able to induce higher levels of SCEs (Ray et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Erol et al (2002) observed that the ionizing radiation dose to which invasive cardiology workers were exposed did not induce an increase in the frequency of SCEs, but could induce an increase of chromosomal aberrations. Vice versa, in agreement with other previous findings (Tug et al, 2013;Engin et al, 2005;Bozkurt et al, 2003;Cardoso et al, 2001;Ray et al, 2001), our study reveals a significantly increased frequency of SCEs among radiation-exposed individuals compared to controls. A possible explanation could be that one of the consequences of the exposure to IR is the production of free radicals able to induce higher levels of SCEs (Ray et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…At DNA level, IR exerts its genotoxic effect by the induction of singleand double-strand breaks, a-basic sites and oxidized bases. Moreover, the exposure to IR has been associated with gene mutations, amplification of genetic material, chromosomal rearrangements and increased frequencies of apoptosis, chromosomal aberrations (CAs), micronuclei and sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) (Lazutka et al, 1999;Limoli et al, 2000;Engin et al, 2005;Dias et al, 2007;Sari-Minodier et al, 2007;Sakly et al, 2012a,b). These genotoxic effects of the radiations would result in each individual in the induction of a carcinogenic process (Breimer, 1988;Overbeek et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this, other studies have also demonstrated that DNA damage is significantly correlated with the dose of IR exposure and the exposure time, and higher doses of IR result in a higher frequency of MN and CAs (13,38) . Interestingly,it was also found that the stable CA rates increased with the cumulative exposure time, while no significance was detected in unstable CA rates and increased exposure time, which may be explained by the fact that stable CAs did not disappear with increase in exposure time, while unstable CAs disappeared with increased exposure time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Some medical uses of radiation, such as nuclear medicine and interventional procedures, may expose the personnel to higher doses, and these are subjects of concern [3]. Recently, Engin et al [4] have assessed the genomic instability in γ-radiation and X-ray-exposed hospital staff and observed that chronic exposure to low levels of IR, below the accepted limit, could induce oxidative stress and increased apoptosis frequency, compared to the nonexposed staff. Information on radiation effects can be considered in the context of cancer risk [5], since there is recent evidence indicating that low doses of radiation exert both suppression and induction of neoplastic transformation [6].…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%