2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11595-016-1343-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of isobutyl-triethoxy-silane penetrative protective agent on the carbonation resistance of concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some broadening in peaks and appearance of hump which suggest that POFA has certain amorphous phases (Figure 4b). From Figure 4, it can be seen that mPOFA and nPOFA contain Quartz (JCPDS = 88-2487), Cristobalite (JCPDS = 82-1410), and amorphous silica (JCPDS = 89-1665) which agree with other researchers’ work [24,28,32,45,46,47]. As the temperature was increased while treating raw POFA, the amorphous silica transformed into the crystalline phase.…”
Section: Test Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…There are some broadening in peaks and appearance of hump which suggest that POFA has certain amorphous phases (Figure 4b). From Figure 4, it can be seen that mPOFA and nPOFA contain Quartz (JCPDS = 88-2487), Cristobalite (JCPDS = 82-1410), and amorphous silica (JCPDS = 89-1665) which agree with other researchers’ work [24,28,32,45,46,47]. As the temperature was increased while treating raw POFA, the amorphous silica transformed into the crystalline phase.…”
Section: Test Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…With regards to carbonation, several studies in the literature indicate that a hydrophobic surface treatment is ineffective in significantly reducing carbonation rates [95] or may even accelerate carbonation, which was assigned to the circumstance that the hydrophobic treatment depresses the concrete moisture content, thus facilitating carbonation [96]. In contrast, other studies reported a positive effect of hydrophobic surface treatment on carbonation progression [97,98], while Xu et al [99] related the potential effect of a silane treatment to the initial porosity of the concrete, suggesting that hydrophobic treatment may be more effective in concrete with a dense pore structure.…”
Section: Prevention and Repair 541 Effect Of Surface Treatments On mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the above studies [93][94][95][96][97][98][99] concern the effect of hydrophobic treatments on the carbonation process, the literature is scarce regarding the effect on reinforcement corrosion in carbonated concrete. Even in cases where hydrophobic treatment reduces the saturation of the concrete pore structure to a degree that facilitates ongoing carbonation, the reduced saturation may simultaneously assist with reducing reinforcement corrosion rates significantly.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Treatments On Corrosion In Carbonated Concmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One was the penetrative protective agent based on organic materials, with intention to block the surface pore structure; the other was the inorganic materials, such as mortar or cement paste, to isolate the matrix from erosion ions in outside environment. Silanes [16], ethyl silicate [17,18], and isobutyl-triethoxy-silane [19] were used as typical penetrative protective agents for the resistance of carbonation and erosion, and a silica-based hybrid nanocomposite was reported for surface treatment to reduce the water absorption and gas permeability [20]. One mechanism behind the enhanced impermeability was that the chemicals could go through the capillary and form an inorganic hydrophobic film along the capillary as a result of reacting with hydration products; the other was that these hydrates in the capillary structure would block the transportation of water and gas [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%