2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of joints on p–y behaviour of laterally loaded piles socketed into mudstone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that pile tip bearing capacity decreased nonlinearly with the buried depth ratio and increased with the intermediate stress parameters [3]. Chong et al conducted a comprehensive numerical simulation of rock-socketed piles by using 3DEC and found that the number of joint sets in rock mass has a significant impact on pile's tip bearing capacity [4]. Kordjazi et al found that pile tip bearing capacity is related to pile cone penetration, established a SVM model, and found that it was better than the traditional CPT-based method for determining a pile's ultimate bearing capacity [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that pile tip bearing capacity decreased nonlinearly with the buried depth ratio and increased with the intermediate stress parameters [3]. Chong et al conducted a comprehensive numerical simulation of rock-socketed piles by using 3DEC and found that the number of joint sets in rock mass has a significant impact on pile's tip bearing capacity [4]. Kordjazi et al found that pile tip bearing capacity is related to pile cone penetration, established a SVM model, and found that it was better than the traditional CPT-based method for determining a pile's ultimate bearing capacity [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a particular pile type embedded in the rock foundation, the rock-socketed cast-in-place piles have a high bearing capacity, low cost, low environmental pollution and public hazards, and better adaptability to the geological strata than other pile types. They are widely used in large projects such as bridges, wharves, and high-rise buildings 1 4 . However, the complexity of rock foundations has become a challenge for engineering design 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the major limitation for the ULS methods is their unrealistic approach to the pile-soil interaction problem, as the mathematical formulations of such methods consider only the pile lateral displacements (no soil deformations). The different types of methods in the subgrade reaction approach developed and studied by several researchers over time include Winkler's approach [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], the P-y curve method [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] and the strain wedge (SW) models [39]. These methods have been used to calculate the allowable lateral pile deflection assuming that the soil is represented by a series of linear or non-linear springs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%