2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2013.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Jujube Honey on Candida albicans Growth and Biofilm Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[30] also reported that the effectiveness of Manuka honey against biofilms formed by S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were less than 100%. Nevertheless, based on this study and others, it is important to note that Manuka honey has an appreciable antibacterial activity against biofilm formed by bacterial organisms [31]. While in this study we demonstrated the ability of Manuka honey to inhibit biofilm formation of C. difficile , Maddock et al .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[30] also reported that the effectiveness of Manuka honey against biofilms formed by S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were less than 100%. Nevertheless, based on this study and others, it is important to note that Manuka honey has an appreciable antibacterial activity against biofilm formed by bacterial organisms [31]. While in this study we demonstrated the ability of Manuka honey to inhibit biofilm formation of C. difficile , Maddock et al .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Recently, Ansari et al . [31] also reported that Jujube honey can disrupt pre-formed biofilms of Candida albicans . Antimicrobial effect of Manuka honey is due to a property referred to as Unique Manuka Factor that is absent in other types of honey [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). According to previous literature the absorption peaks for sugars in the EPS ranged from the mid-infra red region of 800-1128 cm −1 (Ansari et al 2013). These peaks clearly indicated the presence of ␤-glucans and mannans in C. albicans exopolysaccharide and there was a decrease in the intensity of the peak height in the US treated biofilms when compared to the control.…”
Section: Ft-ir Analysis Of C Albicans Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has also proven useful for quantitative biofilm analysis, especially to confirm findings obtained by quantitative (viable count, CV staining) or other imaging (light microscopy, SEM) techniques (Ansari et al, 2013;Chatterjee et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015;Salunke et al, 2014). Among the characteristics of the sample surface examined, height and roughness analyses from AFM images allow quantification of biofilm biomass in terms of thickness and EPS amount, respectively (Ansari et al, 2013;Chatterjee et al, 2014;Danin et al, 2015;Li et al, 2015;Mangalappalli-Illathu et al, 2008;Nandakumar et al, 2004;Qin et al, 2009;Sharma et al, 2010).…”
Section: ;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First used by Bremer et al to visualize biofilms (Bremer et al, 1992), AFM has been mainly applied to gain valuable insights in biofilm structure and mechanisms underlying adhesion, as well as single-and multi-strain biofilm formation (Figure 12) (Boyd et al, 2014;Cabral et al, 2014;Lim et al, 2011;Ovchinnikova et al, 2013;Potthoff et al, 2015). It has also proven useful for quantitative biofilm analysis, especially to confirm findings obtained by quantitative (viable count, CV staining) or other imaging (light microscopy, SEM) techniques (Ansari et al, 2013;Chatterjee et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015;Salunke et al, 2014). Among the characteristics of the sample surface examined, height and roughness analyses from AFM images allow quantification of biofilm biomass in terms of thickness and EPS amount, respectively (Ansari et al, 2013;Chatterjee et al, 2014;Danin et al, 2015;Li et al, 2015;Mangalappalli-Illathu et al, 2008;Nandakumar et al, 2004;Qin et al, 2009;Sharma et al, 2010).…”
Section: ;mentioning
confidence: 99%