2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of kaolin content on the performances of kaolin-hybridized soybean meal-based adhesives for wood composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaolin has a general formula of Al 2 Si 2 O 5 (OH) 4 , which has a typical 1:1 layered silicate structure. [ 20 ] The layered structure of kaolin has uniform‐pore distribution, and it shows good mobility and transport toward Zn 2+ in a neutral environment. [ 21 ] Inspired by its merits, kaolin was adopted as an interfacial and protective layer on the surface of Zn anode to modulate the transference of Zn 2+ while isolating bulk electrolyte from the metal Zn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaolin has a general formula of Al 2 Si 2 O 5 (OH) 4 , which has a typical 1:1 layered silicate structure. [ 20 ] The layered structure of kaolin has uniform‐pore distribution, and it shows good mobility and transport toward Zn 2+ in a neutral environment. [ 21 ] Inspired by its merits, kaolin was adopted as an interfacial and protective layer on the surface of Zn anode to modulate the transference of Zn 2+ while isolating bulk electrolyte from the metal Zn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boiling‐water‐insoluble content of the filler–EMPA system reflects the degree of chemical reaction between the filler and the crosslinker EMPA, which further indicates the efficiency of hybridization between the inorganic filler and the organic polymer and is positively correlated with the water resistance of the modified adhesive . The boiling‐water‐insoluble contents of the five inorganic fillers alone, in increasing order, are 71.77% (MM), 84.01% (KL), 92.72% (TC), 94.03% (LCC), and 95.19% (HCC), whereas the boiling‐water‐insoluble content of the cured crosslinker alone was 81.17%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adhesives are denoted as DSF‐HCC, DSF‐LCC, DSF‐TC, DSF‐KL, and DSF‐MM according to the inorganic filler used. The filler content was 30 wt % based on the weight of the DSF flour or 28.8 wt % based on the weight of the solid organic components (DSF + EMPA) according to the preferable filler content optimized in previous study . An adhesive prepared with DSF flour without an inorganic filler was selected as the control and is denoted as Con‐DSF.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Nevertheless, they are derived from non-sustainable petroleumbased materials, and release toxic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that pose serious threats to the human health. [3,4] In contrast, bio-adhesives made from biomass, such as tannins, carbohydrates, and proteins, are non-toxic and sustainable, which are considered as alternatives to the formaldehyde-based resins. [5][6][7][8] Proteins-especially soybean protein-are renewable, inexpensive, and abundant adhesive materials.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/mame202000458mentioning
confidence: 99%