1990
DOI: 10.1097/00004836-199008000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Lactitol and Lactulose Administration on the Fecal Flora in Cirrhotic Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As there is no satisfactory definition of a bifidogenic effect and no data available about the absolute rise in bifidobacteria CFU counts to obtain a biological relevance, we considered, as most authors, that a substrate is bifidogenic if a statistically significant rise is observed. We did not find a significant increase in Lactobacillus spp after lactulose ingestion, neither faecal pH acidification, as has been previously reported (Riggio et al, 1990;Terada et al, 1992;Salminen & Salminen, 1997). However, results obtained in stool are not necessarily a good indicator for fermentation and acidity in the more proximal colon, which is very difficult to study in vivo due to its relative inaccessibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…As there is no satisfactory definition of a bifidogenic effect and no data available about the absolute rise in bifidobacteria CFU counts to obtain a biological relevance, we considered, as most authors, that a substrate is bifidogenic if a statistically significant rise is observed. We did not find a significant increase in Lactobacillus spp after lactulose ingestion, neither faecal pH acidification, as has been previously reported (Riggio et al, 1990;Terada et al, 1992;Salminen & Salminen, 1997). However, results obtained in stool are not necessarily a good indicator for fermentation and acidity in the more proximal colon, which is very difficult to study in vivo due to its relative inaccessibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In healthy adults the daily intake of 3 g of lactulose for 2 weeks resulted in a significant increase in the number of bifidobacteria in faecal samples, while the numbers of lecithinasepositive clostridia and Bacteroidaceae decreased significantly (Terada, Hara, Kataoka, & Mitsuoka, 1992;Terada et al, 1994). In cirrhotic patients treatment with lactulose for 10 days resulted in a higher number of faecal lactobacilli (Riggio et al, 1990).…”
Section: Lactulose As a Prebiotic?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Riggio et al studied 21 cirrhotic patients with lactitol and lactulose and found a 2 log increase in lactobacilli in both groups with smaller degrees of reduction in Enterobacteria and Enterococci. 10 Tarao et al found that lactitol, when administered for up to 4 weeks in 8 patients significantly increased the occupation ratio, defined as number of that specific bacteria divided by to the total number of bacteria detected, of Bifidobacterium as well as the total Lactobacillus count. 11 They also found a reduced occupation ratio of Clostridium and Bacteroides but no absolute change in number.…”
Section: Culture-based Studies Of Microbiota In Cirrhosis and Hementioning
confidence: 97%