2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.03.409615
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Land Tenure on Adoption of Climate Change Adaptation. Evidence From Malawi

Abstract: The definitive aim of this study was to bring to fore the evidence of the importance of tenure considerations in the designing, development, and implementation of climate change programs. This was done by analyzing how land tenure affects the use of adaptation strategies in Malawi. Using secondary data from the Integrated Household Survey (IHS4), a multinomial logit model was fitted to analyze determinants of adoption of climate change adaptation strategies. Land tenure has shown to significantly affect the ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size computation for the selection of households from each district took into account (i) a 5% margin of error (e=0.05) at 95 % confidence (Z=1.96); (ii) N=84,980; (iii) the proportion (p) for the different variables under investigation (p = 0.88). Moreover, to be consistent with many previous studies of such type [20][21][22], which factored in a design effect ranging from 1.5 to 2.5, this calculation has also considered a design effect of 2.5 to address the multistage sampling inherent errors. Additionally, a 5% non-response rate (NRR) has been accounted for to accommodate households that may be unavailable, inaccessible, uncooperative, or have any other hindrance preventing survey teams from reaching the selected household.…”
Section: Data Collection and Sampling Techniquementioning
confidence: 88%
“…The sample size computation for the selection of households from each district took into account (i) a 5% margin of error (e=0.05) at 95 % confidence (Z=1.96); (ii) N=84,980; (iii) the proportion (p) for the different variables under investigation (p = 0.88). Moreover, to be consistent with many previous studies of such type [20][21][22], which factored in a design effect ranging from 1.5 to 2.5, this calculation has also considered a design effect of 2.5 to address the multistage sampling inherent errors. Additionally, a 5% non-response rate (NRR) has been accounted for to accommodate households that may be unavailable, inaccessible, uncooperative, or have any other hindrance preventing survey teams from reaching the selected household.…”
Section: Data Collection and Sampling Techniquementioning
confidence: 88%