1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf03394628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Length of Training on Stimulus Control Using a Low Density Reinforcement Schedule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have measured the effect of amount of prior training on the degree of control that a stimulus acquires for discrimination or generalization tasks (Farthing & Hearst, 1968;Hearst & Koresko, 1968;Rilling & Budnik, 1975;Sewell & Nickel, 1979;Thomas & Williams, 1963) and reversal (Lovejoy, 1966;Mackintosh, 1965Mackintosh, , 1969McAllister, Capehart & Rogers, 1970;Reid, 1953). In general, results from this body of research show that additional training (or "overtraining", as it is sometimes called) improves stimulus control and leads to faster reversal, although this effect is far from simple and, again, there are conflicting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have measured the effect of amount of prior training on the degree of control that a stimulus acquires for discrimination or generalization tasks (Farthing & Hearst, 1968;Hearst & Koresko, 1968;Rilling & Budnik, 1975;Sewell & Nickel, 1979;Thomas & Williams, 1963) and reversal (Lovejoy, 1966;Mackintosh, 1965Mackintosh, , 1969McAllister, Capehart & Rogers, 1970;Reid, 1953). In general, results from this body of research show that additional training (or "overtraining", as it is sometimes called) improves stimulus control and leads to faster reversal, although this effect is far from simple and, again, there are conflicting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%