2001
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.57.5.858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of levetiracetam on human corticospinal excitability

Abstract: These results suggest that LTC reduces the corticospinal neuronal response to magnetic stimulation, preferentially affecting less excitable neurons. The lack of change in F-wave and CMAP suggests that this effect is mainly derived from the motor cortex.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, F waves are often used in combination with transcranial magnetic stimulation to test whether excitability changes occur in the motor cortex or spinal cord. 5,28,35 This use of F waves for assessing motor neuron excitability is controversial, and H reflexes are usually superior for investigating the excitability of the motor pool. 11,14,18,21,24 However, F waves have the advantage of being easily obtained in a wider variety of muscles than H reflexes, and, in at least some studies, F waves and H reflexes exhibit similar changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, F waves are often used in combination with transcranial magnetic stimulation to test whether excitability changes occur in the motor cortex or spinal cord. 5,28,35 This use of F waves for assessing motor neuron excitability is controversial, and H reflexes are usually superior for investigating the excitability of the motor pool. 11,14,18,21,24 However, F waves have the advantage of being easily obtained in a wider variety of muscles than H reflexes, and, in at least some studies, F waves and H reflexes exhibit similar changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing all encephalitis patients with controls, we found significant differences in RMT which was not detectable in the subgroup without centrally active medication (including all drugs such as tiagabine, diazepam, lamotrigine, piracetam, gabapentin, topiramate, and levetiracetam). Even though there is somewhat conflicting data whether levetiracetam has large or subtle effects on single‐pulse TMS parameters,37, 38, 39 we conclude that the observed differences in RMT might partially depend on medication, while the observed PAS effect is most likely related to receptor changes attributable to NMDAR encephalitis. However, it is also possible that the subgroup without medication was too small to detect differences ( n  = 11), and larger patient sizes are needed to confirm the influence of the medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…49 While formal structured activities may be accurately captured using this method, incidental or unstructured physical activity may be missed, particularly as children typically engage in very short bursts of intensive physical activity interspersed with varying intervals of low to moderate activity. 50 Further testing of the validity and reliability of these subjective questionnaires for children with CP is required.…”
Section: Table Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%